Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Experimental stocking of Colorado pikeminnow in the San Juan River began in 1996. Between <br />1996 and 2000, approximately 832,000 larval Colorado pikeminnow were stocked in the San <br />Juan River. About 727,000 were stocked between IL~1141 and 158. The balance was stocked at <br />R.\tI 52 (Ryden, 2003). Initial retention was encouraging and over winter survival was high <br />(spring captures = 62.5-62.7% of fall captures) and survival between age one and age two based <br />on recapture rates neared 100 percent (Archer et al. 2000). As a result of this initial success an <br />augmentation plan began in 2002 and calls for stocking and monitoring 300,000 age-O Colorado <br />pikeminno\v at R.vI 180.2 and R.vl 158.6 for seven years (Ryden and ~kAda 2003). In addition <br />to augmentation, ongoing recovery efforts include mimicry of a natural hydro graph, adult and <br />larval fish monitoring, habitat and water quality monitoring and c{.mtrol of non-native spe-eies <br />and removal of migration barriers. <br /> <br />In 2003, the fish passage at the P1\"Nl weir was finished and put into operation. During the <br />summer of 2003, 9 Colorado pikeminnow used the fish passage (Lapahie, 2004). One of the <br />goals of the SJRIP is the expansion of range of Colorado Pikeminnow and removal of barriers to <br />migration (SJRIP 1995). The removal of the Cudei diversion dam and construction of fish <br />passage at the Hogback diversion dam in 2001 and the documented use of the fish passage at the <br />PI\xf \\-eir has provided opportunity for and documented use of this upper portion of the river by <br />Colorado Pikeminnow, an important step toward recovery. <br /> <br />The NG\VSP has potential to adversely affect Colorado pikeminnow. Specifically, the proje-et <br />may entrain larval Colonido pikeminnow into the diversion structure, thus adversely affe-eting <br />recruitment of Colorado pikeminnow spawning above the proposed intake. \vltile no spawning <br />sites have been documented above the proposed diversion, the quality of gravel bars suggests <br />spawning potential between the diversion and RLvl 180 (Bliesner 2003). Spa\vning has been <br />documented benveen :R,.\r1129.8 and &"\11133.4 (Ryden, 2000a) while drift data suggest spawning <br />likely occurred at a location somewhat below R..\tll28 (Platania et al. 2000). Given the known <br />range of spawning, the availability of spawning habitat above the diversion and a relatively <br />uniform distribution of available spawning habitat benveen &\<1 128 and R.1\tl 180, about 25 <br />percent of Colorado pikeminnow spawn could occur above the proposed intake (IUv1l 67) at <br />some point in the future (13 of 52 miles above the diversion). If spawning habitat below RM 128 <br />exists as the drift data suggests, then something less than 25 percent of the spa\\;n would be <br />above the diversion. <br /> <br />Based on spa\yning dates in the San Juan River, larvae typically enter the drift from mid-July to <br />~'1id-August (Platania et al. 2000) and are passive in the drift for 3 to 6 days after emergence <br />(Dudley and Platania 2000). Therefore, larval Colorado Pikeminnow spawned above the <br />diversion would be subject to entrainment for about 35 to 40 days. Flows during this period <br />average about 1,500 cfs at the Farmington gage (1993-2003; USGS 2003). The proposed intake <br />will diven about 4 percent (59 cfs) of the total river flow during peak pikeminnow drift. <br />Colorado pikeminnow exit the drift at 0.55 inches and will not be excluded by a 3/32 inch screen <br />(Platania et al. 2000). Thus, we estimate that about 4 percent of larvae spawned above the intake <br />\,,'ill be subject to entrainment. Since only 25% or less of the spawn is expected above the <br />diversion, the net loss is expected to be less than 1 percent of all Colorado pikeminnow larvae <br />produced in the San Juan River. There are no other adverse effects. <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT <br />NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT <br />September 3, 2004 <br /> <br />Page 36 <br />