Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ii <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />helped establish scientific credibility in weather modification during its fifteen years of <br />operation. At its conclusion six states were involved in the program. Since that time, <br />operational application of weather modification technology has increased significantly while <br />research funding has lagged. Considering its past history with AMP and its expertise in <br />atmospheric research, the NAIWMC believes NOAA is the most appropriate federal agency in <br />which to house a new coordinated national weather modification research program. <br /> <br />CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION <br /> <br />Section 206(b) of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (P.L. 102-250) <br />specifically authorized the Bureau of Reclamation to fund the WDMP. The specific provision is <br />as follows: <br /> <br />The Secretary is authorized to conduct a Precipitation Management Technology Transfer Program to help <br />alleviate problems caused by precipitation variability and droughts in the West, as part of a balanced long-term <br />water resources development and management program. In consultation with State, Tribal, and local water, <br />hydropower, water quality and instream jlow interests, areas shall be selected for conducting cost-shared field <br />studies cost-shared on a 50-50 basis to validate and quantifY the potential for appropriate precipitation <br />management technology to augment streamjlows. Validated technologies shall be transferred to non-Federal <br />interests for operational implementation. <br /> <br />WDMP research funding first came from Congress in FY 2002 with an allocation of $2 million <br />in the Energy and Water Appropriations bill. An additional $2 million was approved to continue <br />the program for FY 2003. Since FY 2003, no additional funding has been appropriated for the <br />program. <br /> <br />RECENT LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO AUTHORIZE WEATHER MODIFICATION RESEARCH <br /> <br />On July 17,2007, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas introduced S. 1807, the "Weather <br />Mitigation Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2007." This bill is similar to <br />legislation that Senator Hutchison authored in the 109th Congress (S. 517). The stated purpose of <br />S. 1807 as introduced was to "develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national <br />weather rnitigation policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather <br />mitigation research and development." The bill would establish a Weather Mitigation Advisory <br />and Research Board within the National Science Foundation. The primary function of the Board <br />would be to "promote and fund research and development, studies and investigations with <br />respect to improved forecast and decision-making technologies for weather mitigation <br />operations, as well as to promote assessments and evaluations of the efficacy of weather <br />mitigation." S. 1807 would authorize $10 Million annually for Fiscal Years 2008 through 2017, <br />to remain available until expended. <br /> <br />On August 3,2007, Congressman Mark Udall of Colorado introduced H.R. 3445, the "Weather <br />Mitigation Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2007," which is similar to a <br />bill he authored in the 109th Congress (H.R. 2995) as a companion to Senator Hutchison's <br />original bill. Congressman Udall's bill has the same underlying goal as S. 1807, which is to <br />"develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather mitigation policy <br />and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather mitigation research and <br />development." The primary difference between the two bills is that Congressman Udall's bill <br />