My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12671
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12671
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:14 PM
Creation date
3/25/2008 11:24:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8146.600.30.A
Description
Purgatoire River Study
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/24/2007
Author
USDOI/SGS Lisa D Miller
Title
Losses and Gains for Eight Unlined Canals Along the Purgatoire River Near Trindad, Colorado 2000 - 2004
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />Losses and Gains for Eight Unlined Canals Along the <br />Purgatoire River near Trinidad, Colorado, 2000-2004 <br /> <br />By Lisa D. Miller <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />The u.s. Geo]ogica] Survey conducted a field study <br />from Ju]y 2000 through June 2004, in cooperation with the <br />Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District, Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board, and Bureau of Reclamation, to char- <br />acterize and quantify losses and gains in Picketwire, Baca, <br />EI Moro, Chilili, Enlarged Southside, Model, John Flood, and <br />Hoehne inigation canals. These canals divert streamflow from <br />the Purgatoire River between Trinidad Dam and the city of <br />Hoehne, Colorado. Discharge measurements were made along <br />the eight canals during steady-state conditions to identify sub- <br />reaches with losses or gains. Losses and gains were computed <br />between main-channel measurement sites along each canal by <br />equating inflows to outflows plus flow loss or gain in the sub- <br />reach. As part of this study, multiple discharge measurements <br />also were made at Picketwire, EI Moro, Cbilili, Enlarged <br />Southside, Model, John Flood, and Hoehne canal headgates to <br />compare standard Parshall flume-rated and measured dis- <br />charge at the canal headgates. <br />Results from the discharge measurements showed that <br />Picketwire, Chilili, and Hoehne Canals generally lose flow <br />from the headgate to the end of the canal, although some <br />subreaches showed gains during some measurements. Losses <br />in Picketwire Canal ranged from about 7 percent to about <br />23 percent of the headgate inflow, and Chi]ili Canal losses <br />ranged from about 2 percent to about 34 percent of the head- <br />gate inflow. Hoehne Canal losses ranged from only about 2 to <br />7 percent of the headgate inflow, which is within the uncer- <br />tainty of the measurements. <br />EI Mora Canal appears to lose flow in some subreaches <br />and gain flow in other subreaches. Despite gains in some sub- <br />reaches, measurements show flow losses of about 28 percent <br />of the head gate inflow for the entire El Moro Canal. <br />Losses and gains in Baca, Picketwire, Chilili, and <br />Enlarged Southside canals may be affected by the length of <br />time that the canal has been flowing. Losses in these canals <br />appear to decrease the longer the canal has been continuously <br />flowing. In some cases, subreaches of some of these canals go <br />from losing to gaining flow. <br />Unlike some of the other canals, losses and gains in <br />EI Moro and John Flood Canal do not appear to be related to <br />how long the canal was flowing before the measurements were <br />made. Losses and gains in E] Moro Canal are probably related <br /> <br />to the physical attribules of the canal, such as the canal con- <br />struction and proximity to other canals. Field data indicate that <br />EI Moro Canal gains flow from and loses flow to other canals. <br />Measurements made from the Model Canal headgate to <br />Model Reservoir show canal losses and gains ranging from <br />I to 5 percent of the headgate inflow, which is less than the <br />uncertainty of the measurements. However, measured canal <br />losses and gains from Model Canal downstream from Model <br />Reservoir ranged from a loss of 59 percent to a gain of ] per- <br />cent of the subreach inflow. <br />Measured discharges at the canal headgates were usu- <br />ally higher than the discharges determined using the standard <br />Parshall flume discharge tables. Of the 102 discharge mea- <br />surements made at the canal headgates, 72 of the measured <br />discharges were higher than the corresponding discharges <br />detennined using the standard Parshall flume discharge tables. <br />This means that about 70 percent of the time, the amount of <br />flow that was diverted into the canals was underreported. All <br />measured discharges at the Picketwire and E] Moro head gates <br />were higher than the corresponding l1ume-rated discharges, <br />and all but one measured discharge at the Chilili headgate <br />were higher than the corresponding flume-rated discharges. <br />Discharges measured at the remaining headgates varied from <br />14 percent lower to 27 percent higher than the corresponding <br />l1ume-rated discharges. <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Principal areas of irrigation in the upper Purgatoire <br />River Basin include areas in the vicinity of Trinidad, Colorado <br />(fig. I). Irrigated lands near Trinidad extend down the va]- <br />ley for about 35 miles along gently sloping plateaus. Eleven <br />canal systems downstream from Trinidad Dam are part of the <br />Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District (PRWCD). These <br />canals nxeive water from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineer's <br />(Corps) Trinidad Dam and Reservoir Project to irrigate about <br />20,000 acres of cropland. Irrigation is conducted in accordance <br />with Operating Principles and Operating Criteria established <br />under the repayment contract for the irrigation portion of the <br />Project. The Bureau of Reclamation (BaR) is responsible for <br />administration of the repayment contract (U.S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers, 1978). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.