Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />Canal Losses and Gains 11 <br /> <br />Table 2. Annual total acre-feet and total days used for eight Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District canals, irrigation years <br />2000-2004 (as reported by Colorado Division 7 Water Resources, State Engineers Dffice). <br /> <br />[NA, not applicable] <br /> Irrigation year: 2000 Irrigation year: 2001 Irrigaltion year: 2002 Irrigation year: 2003 Irrigation year: 2004 <br /> Canal Annual Total Annual Total Annual Total Annual Total Annual Total <br /> name total days total days total days total days total days <br /> acre-feet used acre-feet used acre..feet used acre-feet used acre-feet used <br />Baca 1,279.08 166 1,381.49 178 509.38 79 1,177.90 152 993.55 133 <br />Chilili 1,326.78 111 1,273.11 105 23.88 4 1,380.30 114 618.08 55 <br />EI Mom 538.10 106 473.46 126 58.69 18 630.93 143 366.59 78 <br />Hoehne 5,039.72 120 5,345.53 138 2,795.80 80 5,209.74 127 5,215.63 139 <br />John Flood 8,822.41 158 6,946.83 174 563.10 63 5,149.05 167 5,612.91 191 <br />Model 10,974.01 108 7,544.00 119 1,660.92 29 2,275.95 29 10,574.08 120 <br />Picketwire 10,021.00 186 6,011.59 165 649.28 65 4,675.29 145 5,387.27 127 <br />Enlarged Southside 22,227.16 119 12.292.82 74 148.13 5 6,601.78 61 15,411.40 97 <br />Total 60,228.26 NA 41,268.83 NA 6,409.18 NA 27,100.94 NA 44,179.51 NA <br /> <br />Canal, and each Baca turnout is equipped with a Parshall <br />flume. Results from the Baca Canal loss and gain measure- <br />ments are included in this section because, for purposes of <br />this study, Baca Canal is considered to be a subreach of the <br />Picketwire Canal that extends from about 1.5 miles to about <br />3.5 miles downstream from the Picketwire Canal headgate <br />(PWHG) (fig. 1 and fig. 4). Losses and gains for selected <br />subreaches of Picketwire Canal are shown in table 3, and <br />losses and gains for Baca Canal are shown in table 4. <br />Loss and gain measurements were made at numerous <br />locations (fig. 4) along Picketwire/Baca Canal on August 2, <br />2000, May 16,2001, June 18,2003, and June 10,2004. Infor- <br />mation for individual measurements is summarized in table Al <br />in the Appendix. Figure 5 shows losses and gains along <br />Picketwire Canal in relation to distance downstream from the <br />headgate for measurements made on August 2, 2000, May 16, <br />2001, June 18,2003, and June 1O,20D4. <br />On August 2, 2000, discharge measurements were <br />made at main canal and diversion locations from the headgate <br />(PWHG) to PW26, a distance of about 15.1 miles. Leakage <br />was observed at three closed diversion gates (table AI). The <br />total leakage from the three gates was estimated to be about <br />0.9 ft3/s. A gain of about 1.2 ft3/s (3 percent of the subreach <br />inflow) was measured along the Baca subreach from BAOl to <br />BAI0 (table 4). The loss for the entire Picketwire Canal from <br />PWHG to PW26 was computed to be 3.3 ft3/s, or 7 percent of <br />the headgate inflow (table 3 and fig. 5). <br />Discharge measurements were made at main canal and <br />diversion locations from PWHG to PW27, a distance of about <br />16.0 miles, on May 16,2001. No leakage was observed at the <br />diversion gates (table AI). A loss of about 4.6 ft3/s (13 percent <br />of the subreach inflow) was measured from BAOl to PW02 <br />(tables 3 and 4), a 2.4-mile reach. The loss from PWHG to <br />PW27 (table 3) was computed to be 9.4 ft3/s, or 23 percent of <br />the headgate inflow (fig. 5). <br />Discharge measurements were made at main canal and <br />diversion locations from PWHG to PW02 on June 18, 2003 <br />(fig. 4). No leakage was observed at the diversion gates <br /> <br /> <br />(table AI). The loss from PWHG to PW02, a 3.9-mile reach, <br />was computed to be 2.0 ft3/s, or 13 percent of the headgate <br />inflow (fig. 5 and tables 3 and 4). <br />On June 10, 2004, discharge measurements were made <br />at main canal and diversion locations from PWHG to PW26 <br />(fig. 4). Minor leakage of less than 0.02 ft3/s was estimated <br />at three closed diversion gates (table AI). No leakage was <br />observed at the remaining diversion gates. A loss of about <br />1.7 ft3.'s (4 percent of the subreach inflow) was measured along <br />the Baca subreach from BA02 to BAlO (table 4), a 1.9-mile <br />reach. The loss from PWHG to PW26 was computed to be <br />4.8 ft3ls, or 12 percent of the headgate inflow (fig. 5 and table 3). <br />Loss and gain measurements showed that Picketwire <br />Canal generally loses some flow from the headgate to the <br />end of the canal (PWHG to PW26) (table 3 and fig. 5), <br />although some subreaches showed gains in flow during the <br />2000 and 2004 studies. Losses in the canal appear to decrease <br />the longer the canal flows. For example, the greatest loss <br />(9.4 ftJ/s or 23 percent of the headgate inflow) was measured <br />on May 16,2001, when the canal had only been flowing for <br />about 10 days before the measurement, whereas the small- <br />est loss from the headgate to the end ofthe canal (3.3 ft3/s, or <br />7 pewent of the headgate inflow) was measured on August 2, <br />2000, when the canal had been flowing for about 107 days <br />before the measurement (table 3). <br />Main canal measurements were not made at BAO 1 on <br />June 18, 2003, and June 10, 2004, and maim canal measure- <br />ments were not made at BAIO on May 16,2001, and June 18, <br />2003. As a result, losses and gains from BAOl to BAIO (Baca <br />subreach) were not computed for the 2001,2003, and 2004 <br />measurements. Losses and gains are shown in table 4 for <br />reaches from BA01 to PW02 on May 16,2001, from PWHG <br />to PW02 on June 18, 20D3, and from BA02 to BAIO on <br />June 10, 2004. <br />The losses and gains computed along the Baca subreach <br />on August 2, 2000, and June 10, 2004, are small and are <br />within the uncertainty of the measurements (:t5 to 8 percent). <br />The measurement made on June 18,2003, also may indicate <br />