Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLORADO'S TAMARACK PLAN <br />PHASE 3 IMPLEl\1ENTATION <br /> <br />Apri124,2000 <br /> <br />As part of the Water Action Plan, Colorado is committed to an expanded groundwater recharge effort <br />called Tamarack Plan Phase 3. This effort is expected to reduce target flow shortages by an average of <br />approximately 17,000 ac-ft/year over the target flow reductions provided by Tamarack Plan Phase 1. <br /> <br />Three wells next to the river are currently pumping to recharge basins farther from the river at the <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife's Tamarack Ranch State Wildlife Area (SW A) near Crook, Colorado. <br />Seven more wells are scheduled to be drilled by July 2000 and another three by December 2000. This <br />will give a total of 13 wells pumping to recharge at Tamarack Ranch SWAby the winter of 2000- <br />2001. These wells and credits from recharge in existing canals are the basis of Colorado's Tamarack <br />Plan Phase I as described in Tab 3A of the Cooperative Agreement. <br /> <br />The credit from Phase I is an average of 10,000 ac-ft/year for the period of April through September. <br />Colorado's total commitment to provide additional water is Phase 1 plus Phase 3 for a total of 27,000 <br />ac-ft/year. For reference, Tamarack Phase 2 as described in Tab 3B (Colorado's Plan for Future <br />Depletions) of the Cooperative Agreement uses Tamarack Plan reregulation facilities to shift net <br />accretions to the stream resulting from future growth to periods of net depletions from future growth. <br />Remaining net accretions from future growth that are not shifted and occur during times of target flow <br />shortages should be credited as part of Colorado's 27,000 ac-ft/year contribution. <br /> <br />As described in Colorado's Tamarack Plan Tab 3A ofthe Cooperative Agreement and in Boyle's Draft <br />Water Action Plan Revision No.3 (April 2000), existing canals will be utilized for their excess <br />recharge capacity. Current ditch recharge programs are used to augment their shareholder's irrigation <br />well depletions, but also generate excess accretion credits that are not needed for well augmentation. <br /> <br />The following proposed implementation schedule and approximate costs are based on Boyle's Draft <br />Water Action Plan of April 2000 where costs are given in Table III-48 for a Tamarack Phase 3 <br />yielding an average of 17,000 ac-ft/year. Agreements with existing canals would be developed by year <br />2 and wells for recharge on public SW A lands and private lands would be developed at the rate of <br />about 10 wells per year or 5 years to develop up to 50 wells. <br />A./d ~'~ /J,., res.aa..rJ -./ ,/n,-;,E;."":!:7 <br />Program Year Capital Cost (1999 $) Annual Costs (1999 $) <br />1 1,138,600 160,600 <br />2 775,600 221,200 <br />3 775,600 281,800 <br />4 775,600 342,400 <br />5 775,600 403,000 <br />6 0 403,000 <br />7 0 403,000 <br />8 0 403,000 <br />9 0 403,000 <br />10 0 403,000 <br />11 0 403,000 <br />12 0 403,000 <br />13 0 403,000 <br />IW <br /> <br />~!2 m.II;_ <br />~.o <br />..,. 1. h-o I ii, c.... <br /> <br />gg <br />