My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12886
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:19:17 PM
Creation date
3/24/2008 1:50:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.900
Description
Bear Creek
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
4/26/1990
Author
CWCB
Title
Bear Creek Reservoir Operations Study Scope of Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i _ . <br /> <br />Storaqe Accounts <br /> <br />Storage accounts. which will be located either in the <br />permanent pool or in the flood control pool. or both. depending <br />on the reservoir storage scenario employed; will be made <br />available in the following amounts: <br /> <br /> Permanent Flood <br /> Pool Control Total Total <br /> Scenario A&B Scenario B Scenario C Scenario D <br />State space space space 2000 <br /> available available available <br />Indian Hills Water 25 a. f. 0 25 a.f. 25 a. f . <br />District <br />Genesee Water & <br />Sanitation District 100 a. f. lOO a. f. 200 a.f. 200 a. f. <br />Evergreen Metro. 130 a. f. 370 a. f. 500 a.f. 500 a. f. <br />District <br />Town of Morrison 50 a.f. 0 50 a . f . 50 a. f. <br />Mt. Carbon 50 a.f. 600 a. f. 650 a.f. 650 a.f. <br />Lakewood 50 a. f. 550 a. f. 600 a.f. 600 a. f. <br />Englewood 0 600 a. f. 600 a.f. 600 a.f. <br /> 405 a. f. 2220 a. f. 2625 a. f. 4625 a . f . <br /> <br />In Scenario A. there are storage accounts representing the <br />original 1979 requests for 305 a.f. of space plus 50 a.f. each <br />for Mt. Carbon and Lakewood. These six accounts are within the <br />permanent pool. The state would store under its rights in <br />priority to the extent that space is available (vacant) and <br />release water from its account whenever any entity was able to <br />store under its rights. <br /> <br />In Scenario B. those same six storage accounts remain <br />within the pcrm~nent pool and an additioual five stO[dY~ <br />accounts are located within the flood control pool. which rides <br />on top of the permanent pool. It is suggested that Agencies <br />operate off the top or from the flood control account first <br />prior to operating in the permanent pool. The state would <br />operate as in Scenario A. The study consultant could also <br />recommend that the state have an actual storage account of a <br />certain size if such appeared to be a more desirable <br />alternative in terms of minimizing fluctuations. This account <br />would be in the flood control pool. <br /> <br />In Scenario C. there are no storage accounts in the <br />permanent pool. Rather. there are seven storage accounts (one <br />for each entity) for 2625 a.f.. all located in the flood <br />control Fool. The state would operate as in Scenario Band <br />have some type of account. <br /> <br />Scenario D is the same as Scenario C. except that the state <br />would now have an actual account for 2000 acre feet and would <br />not attempt to operate solely to minimize vacant storage space. <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.