My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12705
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSPC12705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:19:16 PM
Creation date
3/21/2008 5:06:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.30.F
Description
Durango RICD - Other Reports
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
9/7/2007
Author
McLaughlin Rincon, Ltd.
Title
Review of Submitted Information Related to the Durango RICD - with staff comments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Durango RICD <br /> <br />30.0 <br /> <br />1 Slalom courses developed from any plol v.4thtn <br />this area are potenllal1y or international <br />standard <br /># . <br /> <br />* ' / ',,- <br /> <br />25.0 <br /> <br />20.0 <br />i" <br />~ 15.0 <br /> <br />'1i <br />II. 10.0 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />00II1...----- <br /> <br />5.0 <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />, <br />-*- .." <br /> <br />0.0 <br />o <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />600 <br /> <br />700 <br /> <br />800 <br /> <br />Discharge - Cubic feet per second <br /> <br />* lClt.o1la....., aru Ceulse <br /> <br />Figure t <br />Flow vs. Fall from Goodman & Parr <br /> <br />Legal Basis <br /> <br />SB 216: <br />SB 216: <br /> <br />Section 2, 37-92-103, (4) Beneficial Use <br />Section 2,37-92-103,(10.3), Recreational In-channel Diversion <br />Means... <br />Minimum Flow Rate <br /> <br />Supreme Court Decision: <br /> <br />Opinion #13. <br /> <br />The hydraulic drop developed at each of the structures is not presente~ and may be <br />inadequate to allow the~pplicant to meet the intended recreational usi'at the minimum <br />flow rat~ <br /> <br />Basis of Opinion <br />The <br /> <br />Legal Basis <br />SB 216: <br />SB 216: <br />SB 216: <br /> <br />Supreme Court Decision: <br /> <br />Appropriate Reach ofthe Stream Required for the Intended Use. <br />Section 2, 37-92-103, (4) Beneficial Use <br />Section 2, 37-92-103,(10.3), Recreational In-channel Diversion <br />Means... <br />Minimum Flow Rate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.