Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Durango RICD <br /> <br />30.0 <br /> <br />1 Slalom courses developed from any plol v.4thtn <br />this area are potenllal1y or international <br />standard <br /># . <br /> <br />* ' / ',,- <br /> <br />25.0 <br /> <br />20.0 <br />i" <br />~ 15.0 <br /> <br />'1i <br />II. 10.0 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />00II1...----- <br /> <br />5.0 <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />, <br />-*- .." <br /> <br />0.0 <br />o <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />600 <br /> <br />700 <br /> <br />800 <br /> <br />Discharge - Cubic feet per second <br /> <br />* lClt.o1la....., aru Ceulse <br /> <br />Figure t <br />Flow vs. Fall from Goodman & Parr <br /> <br />Legal Basis <br /> <br />SB 216: <br />SB 216: <br /> <br />Section 2, 37-92-103, (4) Beneficial Use <br />Section 2,37-92-103,(10.3), Recreational In-channel Diversion <br />Means... <br />Minimum Flow Rate <br /> <br />Supreme Court Decision: <br /> <br />Opinion #13. <br /> <br />The hydraulic drop developed at each of the structures is not presente~ and may be <br />inadequate to allow the~pplicant to meet the intended recreational usi'at the minimum <br />flow rat~ <br /> <br />Basis of Opinion <br />The <br /> <br />Legal Basis <br />SB 216: <br />SB 216: <br />SB 216: <br /> <br />Supreme Court Decision: <br /> <br />Appropriate Reach ofthe Stream Required for the Intended Use. <br />Section 2, 37-92-103, (4) Beneficial Use <br />Section 2, 37-92-103,(10.3), Recreational In-channel Diversion <br />Means... <br />Minimum Flow Rate <br />