My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12668
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12668
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:19:15 PM
Creation date
3/21/2008 4:38:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.30.F
Description
Durango RICD - Other Reports
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
3/1/2006
Author
W. W. Wheeler and Associates
Title
City of Durango Boating Park Hydrology Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />designed 1\)r world class expert paddlers to use water at I.non efs. The que';tion is where <br />in the middle or that spectrum is thejustiliable line to be drawn.'" rd. These rules <br />provide further inliJrlllation to determine where in the middle of that spectrum the RICD <br />claim should be to constitute the minimum stream flow Ii". a reasonable recreation <br />experience. For example. the rulcs require that the applicant specify cacb rccreational <br />opportunity sought at each requested j]ow amount, and describe why the Ilow is the <br />minimum amount for the desired reasonable recreational experience. By requesting this <br />information. howcver, it is not the intent of the board to either second guess the propriety <br />of the applicant's choicc of recreational experience ji}r wbich Ilows are sought or to <br />dictate a particular flow rate lix that experience. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6. The changes to Rule 7(b) are based on the need to analyze the impacts associated <br />with construction and design of RICD structurcs. These lactors. in particular. are based <br />on Hoodplain engineering: engineering principles. hydraulics~ boating principles and <br />existing laws or rules. Issucs such as the slope, length. width and depth of the stream <br />reach, the water vclocity and the effects on the 1l00dplain all relate to whether the <br />applicant chosc an appropriate reach of stream and must be considered in analyzing that <br />lactor. The changes to Rule 7(e) arc premised upon experiences gained by the board to <br />date in the adjudication ofthc RICD cases. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />7. It is important to note that the definition of RICD must be applied whenever that <br />term appears in rule or statute. Although these rules may use abbreviated or modified <br />versions of this definition for brevity or clarity, this will not mean that the definition has <br />changed in any way Irom the full definition. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.