My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12663
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12663
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:19:13 PM
Creation date
3/21/2008 2:41:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.30.D
Description
Durango RICD - Related News Articles
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
6/8/2004
Author
Various
Title
Related News Articles
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.....~.:> aL- ~............ --''''_~__~~_.4 ______ __ <br /> <br />Boston's fashionable Back Bay. aton, Robinson stopped to ad- the day. <br />Robinson, a tall, sturdy woman mire campaign buttons and T- The card bears her name, her <br />with wavy auburn hair and shirts for sale throughout the title, a picture of John F. <br /> <br />DJ~NjO l~ <br />NO lOp--\: .f2- <br /> <br />nallst and gave an InLt:l v 1.fi;.;.Vt/ a.\. ">tv '-J v....u. u..........u.>:>.............. .....1-'. -'"- ---...... h - <br />the FleetCenter. For all the ex- think anything could be as <br /> <br />citement, Robinson was most good as this." <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />iSmelterRapidwater rights bring heated del:ia~ <br /> <br />By Dale Rodebaugh <br />Herald Staff Writer <br /> <br />A possible request by the city <br />. of Durango for water rights at <br />Smelter Rapid, a training <br />ground for world-class kayak- <br />ers, opened a ranging, spirited <br />debate and left a lot of ques- <br />tions Tuesday: <br />@ How much of Animas <br />River water is being used and <br />. who is using it? <br />@ Who has a right to water? <br />@ Are the rights of long-es- <br />tablished users upstream in <br />. jeopardy if the city of Durango <br />acquires water rights for recre- <br />: ation? <br />. @ How much water is <br />enough for kayakers and rafters <br />. to have a good time on 600- <br /> <br />meter Smelter Rapid? <br />@ Is recreation as legitimate <br />a use for water as irrigation or <br />drinking? <br />{) Would a collegial ap- <br />proach to settle conflicting wa- <br />ter demands be preferable to <br />court battles? <br />Probably the only undis- <br />putable thing said at the four- <br />hour meeting at Fort Lewis <br />College appeared to be one of <br />moderator Steve Harris' open- <br />ing remarks. <br />"This is not the last discus- <br />sion on the topic," said Harris, <br />a water engineer. "It's the first <br />discussion." <br />The meeting, convened to <br />bring as many water interests <br />as possible to one spot, opened <br />with four presentations: <br /> <br />@ Ted Kowalski, a legal pro- <br />tection specialist with the Col- <br />orado Water Conservation <br />Board, explained the state's his- <br />tory of setting aside water for <br />special uses and particularly <br />the recent effort of cities to ac- <br />quire water rights for recre- <br />ation. <br />@ Gary Lacey, an interna- <br />tionally . known designer of <br />whitewater parks, said the <br />swelling popularity of white- <br />water sports has reaped huge <br />economic benefits for sponsors <br />for a relatively small invest- <br />ment. Limited water flow <br />won't attract top competitors in <br />the field, he said. <br />@ Jack Rogers, director of <br />public works for the city of Du- <br />rango, said discussion of water <br /> <br />rights for Smelter Rapid that <br />started two years ago ran <br />aground (a reference to ex- <br />tremely low flow in the Animas <br />at the time and lost tourism dri- <br />ven way by the Missionary <br />Ridge Fire). He said water in <br />the Animas benefits many peo- <br />ple other than kayakers. . <br />@ Ken Beegles, the state Di- <br />vision of Water Resources engi- <br />neer in Durango, said the Ani- <br />mas River has no trouble sup- <br />plying present users. But the sit- <br />uation could change if the river <br />is listed as "critical," meaning <br />shortages become more than <br />occasional. ' <br />A state Supreme Court deci- <br />sion on what is the minimum <br />amount of water required for a <br />reasonable recreational experi- <br /> <br />'I <br />t -~i <br /> <br />ence would go a long way in <br />determining how much water <br />Durango could acquire for <br />Smelter Rapid. Kowalski's <br />agency has just appealed an al- <br />location of up to 1,500 cubic <br />feet per second of water to the <br />city of Gunnison to the high <br />court. <br />Fort Collins, Golden, Breck- <br />enridge, Littleton and Vail ac- <br />quired generous water rights be- <br />fore the Legislature approved a <br />bill that changed the law. Long- <br />mont, Steamboat Springs and <br />Pueblo also are seeking stream <br />allocations for whitewater <br />sports. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />5: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />9: <br /> <br />Reach Staff Writer <br />Dale Rodebaugh at <br />daler@durangoherald.com. <br /> <br />Transferable development rights on planning agenda <br /> <br />By Ann Butler <br />Herald Staff Writer <br /> <br />There hasn't been much pub- <br />licity about them lately, but <br />, transferable development rights <br />continue to be on the agenda. <br />TDRs, as they're called, are a <br />. way to encourage density in al- <br />ready built-up areas while pre- <br />. serving areas of public benefit <br />like open space and river corri- <br />dors in others. The program is <br /> <br />voluntary. It allows landowners <br />to sell their development rights <br />and keep their land, while de- <br />velopers increase profits by <br />adding more units to develop- <br />. II)ents already approved else- <br />where where high density is de- <br />sired by government planners. <br />The concept moved ahead <br />last week when The Grandview <br />Rural/Urban Incentives Dem- <br />onstration Group decided to <br />take the results of its two years <br /> <br />of research to both the La Plata <br />County and city of Durango <br />planning commissions. The <br />dates for presentations have not <br />yet been set. <br />It would be a trial program <br />for the Grandview area, and <br />they eventually may be consid- <br />ered for other parts of the <br />county. <br />The group concedes transfer- <br />able development rights may be <br />a moot point for Grandview. <br /> <br />Pat Vaughn, president of the <br />Southern Ute Indian Tribe <br />Growth Fund Properties sub- <br />sidiary, which is in charge of <br />the Three Springs Develop- <br />ment, said "We're already pay- <br />ing for the infrastructure, and it <br />will take a lot of time to do <br />that. We won't be in the market <br />to buy TDRs for more than 20 <br />t030 years." <br />But Nancy Lauro, county <br />planning director, noted that <br /> <br />. ( <br /> <br />the Three Springs development <br />could potentially exchange <br />transferable development rights <br />within the development, allow- <br />ing it to preserve more green <br />and open space. <br />At the group's final meeting, <br />committee members noted that <br />transferable development rights <br />tend to work best in an area <br />that has zoning il1place, whi~h <br />is true at Grandview but not in <br />many parts of the county. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.