My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00290 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00290 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 1:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
The Medicine Bow Ecology Project
Title
The Potential Sensitivity of Various Ecosystem Components to Winter Precipitation Management in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming
Prepared For
Bureau of Reclaimation
Date
2/28/1975
State
WY
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />NATURAL SILVER CONCENTRATIONS IN THE MEDICINE BOW MOUNTAINS <br />Paul Singleton and Randall White <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />...... <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The natural si Iver .concentrations in soi 1, fol iage, and litter <br />were studied in 1972. and 1973. The objective of this effort was to <br />determine natural concentrat~ons of potentially toxic Ag in the environ- <br />. . <br />ment, so that at some future time it would be possible to determine <br />. . <br />. . . <br />if cloud seeding with Agl had resulted in a significant increase of Ag. <br />Twenty sites were located to give a fairly even geographic' <br />representation of the proposed target area (Fig. 2). With one except- <br />ion (site 20), the sit~swere chosen where communities of aspen, <br />lodgepole pine, Eng~lmarin spruce, and grass vegetation could be found <br />in close proximity. Each site was sampled at3 different times <br />spring and fall 1972 and spring 1973. <br />Samples of soi 1, fol iage, and litter were collected from all <br />tree communities, and soil and foliage were coHected from grass <br /> <br />. . . <br />communities. Five tr~es from each forest community at each site were <br />selected for sampling. Fol iage collected from the five trees was. <br />combined into a compo~ite sample to represent that community at that <br />site. Soil and litter'were also collected from under the same five <br />trees and combined Into composite soil and composite litter samples. <br />Fol iage and soi 1 were collected from a circular area of four meters in <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />diameter at each grass community. <br />contami nat i on. <br />Tree fol iage was sampled by breaking 'small branches from the five <br />trees at each site. Grass vegetation was pulled from the plant in <br />preference to c1ipping'to eliminate. the possibility of contamination <br />by clippers. Litter was sampled from under the appropriate tree <br />species by simply collecting the litter in a manner which g~ve~ <br />representative sample from under each of five trees of each species at <br /> <br />Plastic gloves were worn to prevent <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />j 0;:; <br /> <br />_. <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.