Laserfiche WebLink
<br />14 <br /> <br />aMc <br />at = mass rate of condensation on ice <br />C = specific heat of water <br />w <br /> <br />~Ma <br />a-r- = mass rate of accretion of liquid water on ice <br /> <br />From this point the freezing probability in a specific time of a hailstone in an <br /> <br />Eulerian system can be expressed as: <br /> <br />~MO <br />- at <br />P f = MO <br /> <br />at <br /> <br />O~Pf::1 <br /> <br />(eq. 13) <br /> <br />Here the development will digress from pure Eulerian notions of transport in the <br /> <br />interests of physical realism. As hailstones melt it will be assumed that they all <br /> <br />decrease in mass at the same rate d MO/~t given above. Thus, the melting of ice <br /> <br />is a purely advective term (in mass) similar to condensation. A problem arises in <br /> <br />specifying the sink for liquid water produced as a result of melting. In the Eulerian <br />. <br /> <br />system, two-phase particles are not allowed and thus melted water must be stripped <br /> <br />from hailstones to reappear as liquid particles. A variety of possible schemes were <br /> <br />tried and discarded. For example, if the mass melted from each hailstone in a <br /> <br />time step were to reappear as a liquid drop of that mass, then the size spectra of <br /> <br />melted particles would be time-step dependent and the produced drops would be <br /> <br />so small (for practical time steps) that they would evaporate before reaching the <br /> <br />ground as rain. The best scheme was found to be one in which hailstones melt <br /> <br />away in mass at constant number density as described above while melted mass <br /> <br />reappears as raindrops having the same mass as their parent hailstone but at a <br /> <br />~, <br />