My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00288 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00288 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:33:38 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 1:00:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Twelve Basin Investigation - Volume I
Prepared For
Bureau of Reclaimation
Prepared By
Robert D. Elliot, Jack F. Hannaford, Russell W. Chaffer
Date
5/15/1973
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Any layer with a top below a height of D' above the valley floor is assumed not to <br />I... participate in the precipitation process. Excluding such layers, the hase of the <br />, lowest layer encountered is taken to be the base of the effective cloud layer. If <br />there is a layer above this first layer, a check is made to determine whether the <br />. <br /> <br />i two layers are separated in the vertical by more than a distance D. If they are, <br />. <br />, <br />I the top of the lower layer is taken as the top of the effective cloud layer. If <br />i not, the process is continued upward until a layer top is found which has clear air <br />f <br />I extending for a distance of at least D above it. Both D and D' are set to 500 m in <br />f this study. It was determined that the values of D could be changed by a factor of <br />i <br />l two without noticeably affecting the analysis. Once the effective cloud top is thus <br />i determined, it is lifted along a streamline (using the nodal surface concept) to a <br />~ point over the crest. The temperature is determined assuming a moist adiabatic <br />Ii ascent and termed the lifted cloud top temperature. <br />, It should be noted that this method produces an over-abundance of cloud tops <br />I. in the vicinity of -40C. By convention, it is at this temperature that the report- <br />. ing of the relative humidity is discontinued due to instrument unreliahility; For <br />t <br />! temperatures colder than -4OC, the relative humidity is arbitrarily set to 5% in <br />l this study. The dewpoint depression criteria would always return a clear air indi- <br />I cation for such humidities. So no matter how high the cloud tops actually were, <br />I <br />, they could not be recorded with temperatures colder than -40C. The fact that some <br />I <br />! lifted cloud top temperatures have values colder than -4OC is due to the lifting <br />of effective cloud tops near -40C to colder temperatures. This aspect of the <br />method should not hinder the analysis sincE~ these cloud top temperatures are at the <br />edge of or out of the region of interest. <br />In computing the average normal wind component in the effective cloud layer, <br />the method is to average the components for the standard levels that lie within <br />the layer. No interpolation is performed in attempts to produce resolution finer <br />thanfue standard 50 mb intervals. <br />1.2.7.2 Analysis of master files. Three separate programs were used to <br />analyze the data stored in the master file. The first produced a plot of precipi- <br />tation rate versus lifted cloud top temperature and corresponding tabulated data. <br />The second produced scatter diagrams of th,~ various parameters against lifted cloud <br />top temperature. The third produced for each parameter its average, standard devia- <br />tion, frequency, relative frequency, maximum and minimum stratified by SC intervals <br />of lifted cloud top temperature. <br /> <br />1-32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.