My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00288 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00288 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:33:38 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 1:00:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Twelve Basin Investigation - Volume I
Prepared For
Bureau of Reclaimation
Prepared By
Robert D. Elliot, Jack F. Hannaford, Russell W. Chaffer
Date
5/15/1973
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />was not possible to relate a sounding with a precipitation episode, especially if it <br />was of short duration. The basic assumption is that the air mass characteristics <br />depicted by a sounding from a site upwind of a massif will be applicable to the air <br />mass characteristics over the massif at a later time. The Northern Hemisphere series <br />of daily surface and 500 mb charts were used to determine the time lag from the sound- <br />ing station to the massif. Those charts are available only through 1966, at present, <br />and subsequent to this, the NWS daily weathl:!r map series were used to determine the <br />time lag s . <br />For the twelve major basins, there were thirty-three massifs identified. These <br />consisted of independent mountain ranges and in some cases divisions along a mountain <br />range due to differences in orientation and/or topography. In order to provide the <br />necessary input data to complete the analysis for the first seven priority basins, <br />it was necessary to identify precipitation episodes with associated sounding station <br />and time lags for twenty-five of the thirty.-three massifs for the period 1951-1971. <br />1. 2. 5 Comparison of Precipitation Rate~~_:f.<!!:.-1Q9_ mb and_ Cl<.?.ud T_o~J_emperatures_. <br />In the Climax investigations mentioned earlier, the 500 mb temperature was consi- <br />dered representative of cloud top temperature for stratification purposes. Although <br />this may be a reasonable assumption for the winter cases in the Rockies, it is con- <br />sidered to be an over-simplification when looking at the period October through <br />April. In the Twelve Basin Investigation it was considered that a better approxima- <br />tion of cloud temperatures could be made based upon the temperature dewpoint spread <br />as outlined by Elliott et al (1967). <br />Climax 2NW precipitation rate versus cloud top temperature may be seen in Figure <br />1. 2-6. In Figure 1. 2-7, Climax 2NW precipitation rate versus 500 mb temperature may <br />be seen (note different precipitation rate scale). It may be noted that the peak at <br />-16C based on 500 mb temperature is shifted to -26C based on cloud top temperature. <br />A recent study of precipitation rates versus 500 mb temperature in the Sierra <br />(Rowland et al., 1973) indicated that although precipitation rates increased with <br />warmer 500, mb temperatures, there was not a break in the curve representative of a <br />critical temperature. Figure 1. 2-8 shows precipitation rate versus cloud top tempera- <br />ture for Hamilton Branch in the' northern Sierra Lassen massif. Figure 1. 2-9 shows <br />the precipitation rate versus 500 mb temperature for this station. The latter is <br />similar to the curves found in the Sierra study mentioned above. In Figure 1. 2-8 <br />the high rates at temperatures colder than -.35C is felt to be a reflection of cases <br />with warm 500 mb temperatures, but with coldl cloud tops. On this curve a critical <br /> <br />1-24 <br /> <br />/ <br />./ <br />,/ <br />;J <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.