Laserfiche WebLink
<br />......... <br /> <br />I', <br />,. <br /> <br />"-... . <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />assumptions: 1) that seeding agents are unlikely to affect food production <br />in gane habitats; 2) that agents are unlikely to be transformed into forms <br />significantly rrore toxic than they are deFOsited in; and 4) that seeding <br />agents are unlikely to be concentrated up food chains. Assumptions 3 and <br />4 deserve further study and are considered as issues below. The public appears <br />to have a greater concern atout this issue than it deserves, perhaps because <br />of misconceptions atout the concentrations applied and a p::x:>r analogy with <br />DIY!' concentration up through food chains. <br /> <br />Recornnendations <br /> <br />We recorrmend further studies of transformation processes and bioconcentration <br />in the near future (10 years). <br /> <br />Issue 3: Effects of Seeding Agents on Endangered-Species' <br /> <br />At present seeding rates and concentrations seeding agents are unlikely to be <br />detriJrental to endangered species. Our conclusion is based on the assumptions <br />that: 1) that agents are unlikely to affect food supplies directlYi 2) that <br />agents are unlikely to be transforrned into forms significantly rrore toxic than <br />they are deFOsited ini and 3) that seeding agents are unlikely to be con- <br />centrated up food chains. The greater interest of the public in game species <br />than " in endangered species is due perhaps to the greater numbers of SfX)rtsrran <br />than rare species enthusiasts. <br /> <br />P.ecomroendations <br /> <br />\., <br /> <br />Available scientific infomation this p:)int should be made available to inter- <br />ested sports and conservation groups. <br /> <br />Issue 4: "General D:mage" <br /> <br />~bst of the proFOsed effects of seeding agents in this issue category are <br />related to the possibility of toxic effects in a legal sense, since seeding . <br />agents are applied in such small quanti ties. Other effects are probably <br />insignificant: agents are not e-'P8Cted to contaminate the atrrosphere, or water. <br />Public recognition of this issue is probably correlated with a misunderstanding <br />of arrounts applied and this largely legal issue does not appear to be based on <br />actual damages. <br /> <br />Recorrm::mdations <br /> <br />No specific research in this area is needed, but a public relations program <br />of interest and explanation should l:.e maintained. ;'.s this is a case of legal <br />concept, rrost likely, even with the availability of user-related infonration, <br />this issue will continue to be raised. <br /> <br />Issue 5: Bioconcentration <br /> <br />In general, bioconcentration is not a prine issue as it relates to higher <br />organisns. However, plants vary in their capacity to accumulate or exclude <br />Iretals, including Ag, with no manifestations of toxicity arrong the accumulators. <br /> <br />c <br />