Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />- 85 - <br /> <br />number concentration of ice particles to 100R,-1 lengthens the trajectory~ so <br /> <br />that the particles are carried over the Cascade crest, and decreases the <br /> <br />precipitation rate. <br />The above results can be readily understood as follows. In the case of <br />the particles which originate at an altitude of 1. 5 km~ when the concentration <br />of ice particles is 1!l, -1 the cloud does not convert the available water vapor <br />into precipitation in the most efficient manner. An increase in the ice <br />particles to 25t-l does not cause a reduction in the growth rate of an <br />individual ice particle, therefore, all 25 ice particles per liter grow at a <br />similar rate to the original one crystal per liter. Consequently, the <br />trajectory does not change but the precipitation rate goes up by a factor of <br /> <br />25. (This result is~ of course, somewhat unrealistic since the model does <br /> <br />not take into aCCo\U1t the effect which the growing ice particles will have on <br />the liquid water content of the cloud if the concentration of ice particles <br />is less than the critical concentration. This omission becomes increasingly <br /> <br />serious as the ice particle concentration approaches the critical <br /> <br />concentration.) When the ice particle concentration is increased to 100R,-l <br /> <br /> <br />the particles begin to compete for the available moisture. Roughly.the same <br /> <br />total mass of moisture is available as in the case of 25,t-l but it is now <br /> <br />divided between 100 particles per liter. The growth rates and fall speeds of <br /> <br /> <br />the ice particles are therefore reduced so that the precipitation rate <br /> <br />decreases and their trajectories lengthen. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 3.6 shows a set of trajectories corresponding to the upper set <br /> <br />of trajectories in Fig. 3.5 but in this case the air has not been blocked. <br />