My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00314
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:36 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 2:43:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Uintah Ecology Project
Title
Potential Ecological Impacts of Snowpack Augmentation in the Uintah Mountains, Utah
Date
4/20/1981
State
UT
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />regression analysis can be obtained from Table 2-2. The data for total <br />and cool season (October - June) precipitation support our hypotheses <br />(i.e., the north slope does receive more precipitation than the south <br />and the west end of the range receives more precipitation than the east <br />end). At mid-elevations (2745 m), the models predict that the north <br />slope will receive 16.8% more annual precipitation than the south slope. <br />Similarly, at that elevation, the west end of the range should receive <br />18.2% more moisture than the east end. At. 2746 m, October . June precipi- <br />, <br /> <br />tation is predicted to be 24.4% higher on the north than the south <br /> <br />slope, and 27.9% higher on the west than the east end of the range. <br /> <br />The tendency for the northwest corner of the range to receive <br /> <br />larger amounts of precipitation than the rest of the Uintas is also <br /> <br />observable in the April 1 snowpack. Using the average values for April <br /> <br />1 snowpacks on 24 snow courses on the west end of the Uintas (Whaley and <br /> <br />Lytton 1979b), we have computed the average relationships of snowpack to <br /> <br />elevation with a least squares regression model. The deviations of <br /> <br />individual snow courses from the regression line are summarized in both <br /> <br />absolute and relative terms in Table 2-3. The relativized data are <br /> <br /> <br />graphically reported in Figure 2-4. The isolines in that figure group <br /> <br />snow courses that show similar departues from the regression line based <br /> <br />on average tendencies for all snow courses. Figure 2-4 demonstrates <br /> <br />that large portions of the watersheds of the Provo and the Weber Rivers <br /> <br /> <br />receive over 150% as much snow as was predicted by the generalized <br /> <br /> <br />regression model. April 1 snowpack progressively declines in all direc- <br /> <br /> <br />tions as one moves away from the Provo and Weber drainages. The decline <br /> <br />is especially rapid as the crest of the range is crossed on the head- <br /> <br />waters of Rock Creek on the south slope (Figure 2-4). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.