My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00314
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:36 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 2:43:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Uintah Ecology Project
Title
Potential Ecological Impacts of Snowpack Augmentation in the Uintah Mountains, Utah
Date
4/20/1981
State
UT
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION <br />OF PRECIPITATION <br />It has seemed useful to us to determine how precipitation varies in <br />time and space in the study area. We consider first how precipitation <br />varies in space in the Uinta Mountains. It has long been accepted that <br />the major part of the winter storms that strike northern Utah come from <br />a northwesterly direction as moist air masses from the north Pacific <br />Ocean are driven inlands by the prevailing westerly winds (Eubank 1979). <br />Since the long axis of the Uintas is oriented east and west, we wondered <br />whether the northwestern 'portion of the range received more precipita- <br />tion than the south slope which should experience a "rainshadow" effect, <br />if the postulated weather patterns noted above did indeed prevail. By <br />the same logic, one might expect the eastern end of the range to receive <br />less precipitation than the western end. <br />In order to evaluate the foregoing hypotheses, we grouped SCS <br />precipitation storage gages by their location on the range (i.e., north <br />or south slope; east or west end of the range). The breakdown of sta- <br />tions is shown in Table 2-2. The north-south breakdown was made along <br />the watershed divide running east and west with the Provo and Weber <br />drainages being tallied as part of the north slope. The east-west break <br />was made along a line running north and south at longitude 110024' 30". <br />This line ran just to the west of the Henry's Fork Station and just to <br />the east of the Lakefork Mountain Station (Figure 2-2). <br />In order to generalize the results of our analyses, separate linear <br />regression analyses relating elevation to precipitation were made for <br />all north slope, south slope, west end and east end stations. The <br />results are shown graphically in Figure 2-3. Sample size for each <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.