Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION <br />OF PRECIPITATION <br />It has seemed useful to us to determine how precipitation varies in <br />time and space in the study area. We consider first how precipitation <br />varies in space in the Uinta Mountains. It has long been accepted that <br />the major part of the winter storms that strike northern Utah come from <br />a northwesterly direction as moist air masses from the north Pacific <br />Ocean are driven inlands by the prevailing westerly winds (Eubank 1979). <br />Since the long axis of the Uintas is oriented east and west, we wondered <br />whether the northwestern 'portion of the range received more precipita- <br />tion than the south slope which should experience a "rainshadow" effect, <br />if the postulated weather patterns noted above did indeed prevail. By <br />the same logic, one might expect the eastern end of the range to receive <br />less precipitation than the western end. <br />In order to evaluate the foregoing hypotheses, we grouped SCS <br />precipitation storage gages by their location on the range (i.e., north <br />or south slope; east or west end of the range). The breakdown of sta- <br />tions is shown in Table 2-2. The north-south breakdown was made along <br />the watershed divide running east and west with the Provo and Weber <br />drainages being tallied as part of the north slope. The east-west break <br />was made along a line running north and south at longitude 110024' 30". <br />This line ran just to the west of the Henry's Fork Station and just to <br />the east of the Lakefork Mountain Station (Figure 2-2). <br />In order to generalize the results of our analyses, separate linear <br />regression analyses relating elevation to precipitation were made for <br />all north slope, south slope, west end and east end stations. The <br />results are shown graphically in Figure 2-3. Sample size for each <br />