Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />Elevation (m) <br /> <br />Annual Precipitation (cm) <br /> <br />2,134 (7,000 ft) <br />2,438 (8,000 ft) <br />2,743 (9,000 ft) <br />3,048 (10,000 ft) <br />3,353 (11,000 ft) <br /> <br />54.4 (21.4 in) <br />62.0 (24.4 in) <br />69.6 (27.4 in) <br />77.2 (30.4 in) <br />84.8 (33.4 in) <br /> <br />Precipitation thus increases 7.6 ern per 305 m rise in elevation (3 <br /> <br />in/lOOO ft). It should be noted that this model shows wide dispersion <br /> <br />around the regression line (r = .521). The regression is none-the-less <br /> <br />statistically significant at the .01 probability level. <br /> <br />.~~ <br /> <br />The average relationship of water content in the April 1 snowpack <br /> <br />at various elevations is given in Table 2-1 and Figure 2-1. The data <br /> <br />demonstrate great variation from snow course-to-snow course in any given <br /> <br />altitudinal class (e.g., the snow course supporting the lightest average <br /> <br />snowpack on April 1 in the 2,438 - 2,743 m elevation class received only <br /> <br />about 12% as much snow as the course with the heaviest average snowpack <br /> <br />in that elevational zone). Nevertheless, when all snow courses within a <br /> <br />zone are averaged, there is a general trend toward increasing snowpack <br /> <br />with elevation (Figure 2-1). Arthough Figure 2-1 shows a sizeable <br /> <br />decline in snowpack at the highest elevation category, the sample con- <br /> <br />sists of only one snow course. When other snowcourses and years are <br /> <br />added to the analysis. the marked decline at the highest elevations is <br /> <br />largely eliminated. As might be expected. year-to-year variation in <br /> <br />average snowpack tends to be random among elevation classes. Year-to- <br /> <br />year variation apparently reflects broad synoptic patterns and is thus <br /> <br />quite uniform across the elevational gradient. <br />