Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(GSFC). Since May 2000, most of my research in <br />the Environmental Modeling Center (EMC) at the <br />National Center for Environmental Prediction <br />(NCEP) has been to improve cloud and radiation <br />parameterizations in operational forecast models, <br />particularly the operational Eta model (Black, 1994; <br />Rogers et a/., 1996). <br /> <br />3. BROAD USE OF MICROPHYSICS MODELS <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CLOUD MICROPHYSICS MODELING: THE LASTING LEGACY OF HAROLD D. ORVILLE <br /> <br />Brad S. Ferrier',1,2 <br /> <br />1NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC, Camp Springs, MD 20746-4304 <br />2SAIC/GSO, Beltsville, MD 20705-2675 <br /> <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Cloud microphysics is an important area of <br />study in atmospheric sciences that impacts our <br />lives in so many ways, serving the central role in <br />the atmospheric water cycle. Some of the most <br />important environmental issues, such as global <br />warming and air quality, are strongly impacted by <br />our understanding (or lack thereof) of cloud <br />microphysics. Some within the cloud physics <br />community may view their work through more <br />narrowly defined areas of specialization. What is <br />remarkable about Professor Harold D. Orville is <br />the international recognition of his contributions to <br />so many different aspects of cloud microphysics in <br />particular, but also in atmospheric sciences in <br />general. <br /> <br />This contribution will highlight Prof. Orville's <br />contributions to the field of cloud microphysics <br />modeling by providing some background of <br />microphysical models, my personal perspective of <br />the current state of cloud microphysics modeling, <br />and finally suggestions for future research. But <br />before doing so, I'm going to provide a little <br />background of my recent activities, because they <br />shape my perspective and my biases on the state <br />of cloud microphysical modeling and research. <br /> <br />2. RECENT ACTIVITIES <br /> <br />I also cannot help but feel a little <br />uncomfortable, because I have not kept pace with <br />advances during the past year or two in cloud. <br />microphysics modeling, particularly at cloud <br />resolving scales of motion where the horizontal <br />re$olution is several km or less. I have not <br />worked on microphysics packages in these <br />models since the mid 1990s. In late 1996 lied the <br />Ground Validation operational data processing in <br />support of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission <br />(TRMM) at NASNGoddard Space Flight Center <br /> <br />'Corresponding author address: Brad S. Ferrier, <br />NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC W/NP2, 5200 Auth Rd., <br />Rm. 207, Camp Springs, MD 20746-4304; <br />E-mail: Brad.Ferrier@noaa.aov <br /> <br />The interdisciplinary nature of cloud physics <br />research has grown exponentially during the past <br />few decades. As in other areas of specialization <br />within the Atmospheric Sciences, cloud physics <br />research is primarily in the form of observational <br />studies, numerical modeling studies, and <br />theoretical (laboratory) studies. But unlike most <br />other atmospheric fields of study, advancements in <br />cloud microphysics continue to rely heavily on <br />knowledge gained from laboratory experiments. In <br />some ways, the fundamental nature of cloud <br />microphysics is similar to turbulent fluid flows, in <br />that both are incredibly complicated and far <br />beyond our ability to comprehend. Like with <br />numerical models of turbulent fluid flows, state-of- <br />the-art cloud microphysical models can be <br />exceedingly detailed and complex. Taken <br />together, it is no wonder that even the "best" cloud <br />numerical models, which are the collective <br />repositories of our knowledge of turbulent fluids <br />and thermodynamics, are still quite flawed. And <br />yet, we have made great strides during the past <br />several decades in improving our understanding of <br />how clouds work and in representing their effects <br />in numerical models. <br /> <br />Cloud microphysical models are used in a wide <br />variety of research areas, such as advertent and <br />inadvertent weather modification; atmospheric <br />electrification and lightning; atmospheric chemistry <br />and air quality monitoring; developing improved <br />remote sensing techniques from radars, lidars, <br />profilers, and satellites, involving a large portion of <br />the electromagnetic spectrum; numerical weather <br />prediction (NWP) forecasts of mid latitude systems, <br />hurricanes, severe and non-severe local storms, <br />squall lines, and other mesoscale convective <br />4 <br />