Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> lc <br /> 72 <br /> ." <br /> 56 <br /> 'I' <br /> 4.8 'I' <br />- <br />E <br />':3.2 <br />"" 2. <br /> 1.6 <br /> <br />.8 <br /> <br /> <br />O.lba 0.8 <br /> <br />Figure 2 - a) cloud water, b) rainwater, c) rain <br />charge density, and d) vertical electric field. <br /> <br />Takahashi (1979) conducted simulations with a <br />model similar to Chiu's, except that the <br />microphysics were described by multiple <br />categories rather than as bulk quantities. <br />Takahashi's results indicated that inductive <br />charging in warm clouds would not lead to strong <br />electrification. Apparently neither Chiu nor <br />Takahashi were aware of studies by Jennings <br />(1975) that showed inductive charging between <br />rain and cloud droplets to be self extinguishing <br />(the separation probability goes to zero) when the <br />electric field exceeds 30 kV/m, indicating that <br />strong electrification by inductive charging of warm <br />clouds could not occur. Despite this, the <br />adaptation of the processes mentioned above to <br />the multidimensional, coupled model environment <br />achieved by Dr. Chiu was a significant step <br />forward for electrical modeling and came about as <br />a result of Dr. Orville's men~orship. <br />During this period, I was working on my PhD <br />at the State Univ. of NY at Albany under Dr. <br />Richard Orville. I was developing my own 20, <br />slab-symmetric model of warm-rain electrification <br />and was having trouble deciding on a final focus <br />for my dissertation research, in addition to some <br />problems with. numerics. I was familiar with the <br />work going on at South Dakota Tech and when Dr. <br />Orville came to Albany to visit his brother, I was <br />eager to meet with him. We met on a Saturday <br />morning and discussed my modeling work for 4 <br />hours. During that time Dr. Orville gave me <br />suggestions for clearing up the problems I was <br />having with numerical methods as well as <br />suggesting an avenue of investigation, the effect <br />of chaff-produced ions on the electrical state of a <br />storm, that became the subject of my dissertation <br />(Helsdon, 1979). <br />Because of his interest in weather <br /> <br />modification, Dr. Orville was aware of recent work <br />done by Holitza and Kasemir (1974) and Kasemir <br />et al. (1976) to test the feasibility of suppressing <br />lightning by dispensing conducting chaff fibers in a <br />thunderstorm and suggested that I focus my <br />dissertation research on modeling the effects of <br />chaff dispensed into the model storm. While I was <br />aware that the water/water inductive process was <br />unlikely to be a primary mechanism responsible <br />for thunderstorm electrification, the mechanism <br />could be used to create fields large enough to <br />simulate ion production by chaff fibers distributed <br />within the cloud and their effect on the strength of <br />the electrification. In the last year of my research, <br />the accident leading to the death of Dr. Chiu <br />occurred and an advertisement to fill the vacant <br />position was published. Dr. Richard Orville <br />brought this ad to my attention and encouraged <br />me to apply for the position, which I did. I was <br />fortunate to be accepted and upon completion of <br />my dissertation, I began working at the lAS in <br />February of 1979 in close collaboration with Dr. <br />Orville and Richard Farley, a collaboration that <br />continues to this day. <br />Within the first year, we converted the model <br />to run on NCAR computers and I submitted a <br />manuscript based on my dissertation to the <br />Journal of Applied Meteorology (Helsdon, 1980). <br />The results showed that chaff seeding reduced the <br />electric field in two ways: 1) directly by producing <br />ions that neutralize charge on hydrometeors by <br />conduction and convection, and 2) indirectly by <br />reducing the electric field globally in such a <br />manner to reduce the charge separation by <br />induction throughout the cloud. Results also <br />showed that early or late seeding achieved nearly <br />identical overall results, although there were <br />differences in the initial field variation. Figure 3 <br />shows results from (A) early and (B) late seeding <br />cases compared with a non-seeded case. <br />After the chaff seeding work was completed, <br />rather than continue with the model that had been. <br />developed at Albany, we began adding the various <br />charging mechanisms to the most recent version <br />of the IAS cloud model (Orville and Kopp, 1977). <br />In 1981 the Cooperative Convective Precipitation <br />Experiment (CCOPE) was carried out near Miles <br />City, MT. On 19 July a small, marginal (one <br />recorded lightning flash) thunderstorm was well <br />observed by aircraft and radar. Among the <br />observations was a rather comprehensive set of <br />electrical data obtained by the Desert Research <br />Institute Aerocommander and the NCAR sailplane <br />(Gardiner et al., 1985; Dye et al., 1986). The <br />development of the Storm Electrification Model <br />(SEM) reached the testing phase after the <br /> <br />37 <br />