Laserfiche WebLink
<br />copy of David Letterman's top ten list). <br /> <br />i. Qualitative and quantitative understanding of <br />how ice is initiated in clouds for all ranges of <br />temperature, moisture, height, and other <br />salient input conditions. <br /> <br />ii. Qualitative and quantitative understanding of <br />ice multiplication mechanisms in clouds. A <br />better understanding of the occurrence of very <br />high numbers of ice particles observed in <br />tropical convective systems (Houze and <br />Churchill, 1987; Gamache, 1990), hurricanes <br />(Black and Hallett, 1986), and maritime <br />cumulus clouds (e.g., Hobbs and Rangno, <br />1990). <br /> <br />Hi. A better understanding of the habits and <br />particle size spectra of ice in the convective, <br />transition, and stratiform components of <br />mesoscale convective systems. Recent <br />results from the TRMM field campaigns are <br />beginning to shed some insight on this, <br />particularly in areas of cirrus and light <br />stratiform precipitation (Heymsfield et a/., <br />2002). <br /> <br />iv. Improved quantitative understanding of the <br />collection efficiencies and fracturing rates <br />between colliding ice particles, at least to <br />where there is reasonable consensus within <br />the community. <br /> <br />v. Interpreting aircraft observations of rapidly <br />evolving, smaller-scale convective events into <br />appropriate time- and volume-averaged <br />quantities useful for model evaluation. <br /> <br />vi. Using more sophisticated schemes to improve <br />simpler, faster schemes. <br /> <br />9. CURRENT AND FUTURE RESEARCH <br />INITIATIVES <br /> <br />There is great promise in. the foreseeable <br />future that cloud microphysical modeling will play <br />an ever-increasing role in enhancing the remote <br />sensing capability of our planet. Many of the new <br />instruments on NOAA and NASA satellites are <br />designed to gain a better understanding of cloud, <br />precipitation, and radiation processes (e.g., <br />passive-microwave channels, TRMM radar, <br />CERES, MODIS), in which microphysical models <br />coupled with radiative transfer models are used in <br />algorithm development, validation exercises, and <br /> <br />data assimilation. These models are also used in <br />a wide variety of conventional and multiparameter <br />radar applications, Iidar retrievals, and other <br />remote sensing platforms. Several groups have <br />been working on assimilating radar reflectivity data <br />into numerical models (e.g., at Univ. Oklahoma, <br />NSSL, NCAR), requiring the use of cloud <br />microphysical models. This is a rapidly growing <br />effort in the community, and plans are to begin a <br />similar effort at EMC in assimilating reflectivity data <br />into operational models. The total volume of data <br />received at NCEP has increased by two orders of <br />magnitude during the past three years (of which <br />-10% is assimilated into the models), and this data <br />volume is expected to increase by three orders of <br />magnitude by the end of this decade. Some of this <br />will involve improved cloud measurements, where <br />microphysics models will be used at various points <br />in the data flow between satellite observations and <br />model assimilation. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />There are several exciting community-based <br />research initiatives. One is the ongoing GEWEX <br />Cloud Systems Studies (GCSS), which has been in <br />existence for over a decade. It is composed of five <br />working groups focusing on (1) boundary-layer <br />clouds, (2) cirrus clouds, (3) extratropical (frontal) <br />clouds, (4) deep convection, and (5) polar clouds. <br />The primary mission is to improve the cloud <br />parameterizations in climate models, with a <br />secondary emphasis on improving global models. <br /> <br />Another major community modeling initiative is <br />the WRF model. It is a non hydrostatic modeling <br />system designed for cloud-scale and regional- <br />scale modeling at grid resolutions between 1 km <br />and 10 km. The WRF model system is intended to <br />bridge the gap between research and operational <br />modeling efforts by providing a common modeling <br />infrastructure with unified coding standards. It is a <br />joint effort between NCEP, NCAR, FSL, and the <br />Univ. of Oklahoma, as well as involving other <br />institutions and the university community. Multiple <br />dynamic cores and physics packages will be <br />available as options for the user to select. When I <br />attended an international workshop last year in <br />Europe, I realized that most of the European <br />countries have created their own WRF-Iike efforts <br />involving multi-national consortiums designed for <br />improved regional scale modeling. <br /> <br />What is exciting about WRF is that cloud <br />microphysics will play an important role in both <br />research and operational NWP communities. The <br />WRF model will be a true community model with <br />10 <br />