Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />of Fraser et"al. (1973), Hobbs et al. (1973), Young (1974b,c), and <br />Plooster and Fukuta (1975). <br />With any method, it is Daramount that the natural physical <br />structure and natural variability associated with the cloud system to be <br />modified is understood. Without such background, the tremendous <br />variability of the structure of the atmosphere, the complications of <br />scale interaction, and the certainty of the "bad draw" will ultimately <br />plunge the scientific results into controversy. This has been the fate <br />of many otherwise carefully planned and executed programs (e.g. Braham <br />et al., 1971, Hobbs and Rangno, 1979; Rangno and Hobbs, 1980; Smith and <br />Miller, 1984). <br />Weather modification research programs have been carried out in the <br />western United States for over 25 years. The immediate emphasis of the <br />majority of these programs has been to determine the effects of cloud <br />seeding on precipitation. Prior to 1977, little emphasis has been <br />placed on studying the natural physical structure of the cloud systems <br />to be modified. Two notable exceptions have been the Cascade Prpgram <br />(Hobbs, 1975a) and the Colorado River Basin Pilot Project (Cooper and <br />Marwitz, 1980). In the latter case, the majority of the measurements of <br />the natural physical structure of the clouds were made at the end of the <br />project. After 1977 ,_~he e]!1phaa;l..s ;in w!atherJ1pdificaUQ.nre~eftrch <br />.~.j~l'!l~~.J!.(LP.bys.~cal eVB;l~~ A muoh stronger emphasis was plaoed on <br />~tudy;ing natural cloud conditions. Two factors influenced this change. <br />lhe first was that physical results $uch as Hobbs (1975a) and Cooper and <br />Marwitz (1980) conflicted with the conceptual models of cloud system <br />structure that formed the basis of the hypothesis of the earlier <br />experiments. The second and major factor was that new instrumentation <br /> <br />