Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />models; to provide information for direct comparison of laboratory and <br /> <br />model results with atmospheric clouds; and to provide information for <br /> <br />planning cloud seeding research and operations. <br /> <br />These general objectives can be separated into seven specific <br /> <br />objectives for this research. These are: <br /> <br />1. Define and demonstrate appropriate experiments for using a <br /> <br />continuous expansion cloud chamber and other available tools to <br /> <br />assess the separate and combined roles of the four hypothesized <br /> <br />primary modes of ice nucleation (deposition, condensation- <br /> <br />freezing, immersion-freezing, and contact-freezing, as defined in <br /> <br />Chapter 4) for any ice nucleating aerosol. <br /> <br />2. Using defined experimental methods, determine the efficiencies, <br /> <br />nucleation rates and mechanisms of two commonly used, chemically <br /> <br />different ice nucleating aerosols, as they relate to cloud <br /> <br />temperature, supersaturation and droplet concentration. The <br /> <br />effect that condensation temperature and parcel history of <br /> <br />temperature and humidity have on the nucleation modes, <br /> <br />efficiencies and rates are also assessed. <br /> <br />3. Perform numerical cloud model simulations using the same <br /> <br />initialization criteria and expansion rates as cloud chamber <br /> <br />experiments. An existing detailed microphysical model (Young <br />1974a) is used. Areas where current descriptions of artificial <br /> <br />ice nuclei function are unsatisfactory are identified, based on <br /> <br />comparing the model results with those from the cloud chamber. <br />