My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00297
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00297
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:34:17 PM
Creation date
3/5/2008 11:28:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Hygroscopic Seeding in Oklahoma
Date
10/31/1971
State
OK
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />longer lasting cloud. Good hydrometeor development generally requires a 20 <br />minute lifetime in the cloud - and much longer if the cloud is diluted. For the <br />stronger upcurrent cases, the larger starting sizes are required if the particle <br />is to stay below the -40C slow-growth regime. Figure 10 is based in part on <br />Kluzura's calculations. It summarizes some of these concepts, and for pre- <br />cipitation initiation compares hygroscopic seeding to AgI seeding. It shows, <br />for various upcurrents, how high a cloud must be for the growing hydrometeor <br />to fall back down through the upcurrent rather than blow Ol)t the top. It shows <br />the same for AgI. From the sm.all diagram on the ri'ght of Figure 10 it is <br />evident that in Oklahoma many of the clouds fall into the category where hydro- <br />meteors evolving from hygroscopic particles will grow well while tho~e from <br />'AgI (and from natural liquid embroyos from stochastic processes) start too <br />late and move up too fast to grow large enough to fall through the upcurrent. <br />The AgI may ma~e the cloud bigger and alter the situation, but that is not <br />considered here. Hygroscopic seeding offers the chance of extracting a <br />bigger percentage of water from a large cloud -- less is lost to the upper <br />atmosphere in the form of cirrus. It also can extract water from smaller <br />natural clouds, including ones which ar~ not supercooled. <br /> <br />When considering the actual seeding of real clouds using real particle generating <br />equipment, one is confronted with a broad s.pectrum of particle sizes. There <br />is no way to know at this time the distribution of particles released by our <br />spray system as used in Oklahoma. We may make some reasonable <br />assumptions by assuming that of 1. 0 unit of liquid dispensed, 0.03 was <br />near the 10 pm dia. size range, 0.04 was near the 20 pm dia. range, O. 10 <br />was in the 30 pm dia. range, and O. 15 was in the 40 pm range. Note this <br />totals only 0.34 of the material - - we assume 2/3 of the material is wasted, <br />primarily in the form of inefficient, large droplets. The resulting multiplier <br />considering the droplets distributed as given above is 4. 2. 106, if all become <br />single 5 mm raindrops. The biggest contribution comes from the 10 pm size <br />category. Using this derivation we should get about 4 acre-feet of water per <br />kg of hygroscopic material, assuming perfect clouds. Hail growth and the <br />Langmuir chain reaction increase this figure, while non-optimum matching <br />of hydrometeor size to the upcurrent will decrease it, i. e., not every embryo <br />will build a drop as large as 5 mm dia. Considering everything, getting 1 <br />acre-foot of rain from 1 kg of spray seems to be a reasonable goal. <br /> <br />It is instructive to hypothesize by several approaches how many embryos. <br />are needed for practical seeding. The previous discussion was only con- <br />cerned with individual, non-interfering particles. <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.