Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. . <br /> <br />point is difficult for aircraft sampling. Adjusting for cloud chamber mixing, the maximum aircraft- <br />measured concentration of IN was less than 20 IN L.1 effective at -20 oe. The temperature at this level <br />was -8 oC, implying the maximum concentration of effective IN was less than 1.5 L-1. Zones of SL W <br />over the Plateau were targeted by IN, though indications are that this was in a shallow layer. Later in the <br />experiment, IN concentrations on the Plateau were reduced to near-background levels. <br /> <br />For the present case study, modeling suggests that the valley-released AgI had an initial vertical impetus <br />by the gravity wave mechanism which provided transport above the surface inversion. This was followed <br />by orographic forcing in a more organized westerly flow. The model confirmed the confinement of the <br />plume to a shallow layer and subsequent lifting again due to a gravity wave further eastward in the <br />vicinity of the TAR site. <br /> <br />It may be possible to exploit the influence of gravity waves in. surface-based seeding strategies. This was <br />explored by Heimbach and Hall (1994) who applied the model to several source configurations. Super <br />(1994) suggested that targeting might be enhanced if releases were from a barrier upwind of the Plateau, <br />in this case the San Pitch Mountains. Targeting from high altitude releases is generally successful <br />provided there is an organized cross-barrier wind component. On the other hand, valley releases have <br />uncertainties in terms of reaching the target and doing so in sufficient concentrations (ibid). Therefore, <br />the gravity wave mechanism would be best exploited with valley releases which can "load" an entire <br />valley floor with high IN concentrations. The wave structures can be wide ranging depending on speed <br />and stability, making a broad source area or pool of aerosol advantageous. Seeding from the valley sites <br />could not take advantage of fast-acting forced-condensation nuclei (Finnegan and Pitter 1988) because the <br />temperatures are frequently above -6 oC (Li and Pitter 1997). Therefore, a contact nucleant would be <br />appropriate provided the gravity wave mechanism contributed to a deep enough lifting to reach <br />sufficiently colder temperatures. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The criteria for judging the possibility of gravity wave excitation are uncomplicated: (1) a cross-barrier <br />wind component exists, and (2) the atmosphere is stable. For the latter, this implies potential temperature <br />increases with height which includes moist adiabatic profiles commonly observed in project soundings. A <br />more objective criteria can be devised using the Proude number, Fr. This is a nondimensional ratio of <br />vertical perturbation to horizontal wind speed, <br /> <br />Fr= vh/ U, <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />where U= cross-barrier wind speed, v ="the Brunt-Vaisalla frequency (Eq. 1), and h = the height of the <br />barrier. Gravity waves are stimulated when Fr <1 (Bruintjeset al. 1995), a criteria easily tested with a <br />sounding. Por Froude numbers between 1 and 2, high amplitude waves can be formed over the lee slope <br />of a barrier (Smolarkeiwicz and Rotunno 1989). This suggests that for low wind speed and high stability <br />conditions, the lee of the San Pitch Mountains could be a reasonable release zone. However, dilution, the <br />subsequent downward portion ofthe wave and horizontal targeting issues complicate this application. For <br />the current case, Fig. 6 suggests that the upwind side of this barrier would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Super. (1995a) suggests the Utah operational netWork in the Sanpete Valley, though' sometimes successful <br />at targeting the Plateau, often provided low concentrations effective at the ambient temperatures. <br />Effecti"etargeting would require a strong source configuration with many more generators and/or higher <br />output generators. Figure 6 also indicates that the west side of the Sanpete Valley could provide some <br />initial upward impetus; however, the subsidence portion of the gravity wave could have a detrimental <br />influence on targeting. Releases further upwind of the current valley sites have the disadvantage of <br /> <br />. .. <br /> <br />78 <br />