Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.- <br /> <br />statistical techniques could be very useful, but their development may be difficult in view of uncertainties <br />of just how seeding responses vary among the population of treated units. Fourth, and most important, a <br />." much improved physical understanding is needed prior to development of any future statistical design. A <br />decade ago Braham (1981) made a strong case for improving our physical understanding before <br />conducting any further "black box" experiments that have a major emphasis on demonstrating <br />precipitation changes at the ground. His advice is as valid today. <br /> <br />8.2~ Huggins, Arlen w., 1992: Mapping Supercooled Liquid Water with a Mobile Radiometer. <br />Symposium on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification, AtlaJita, GA, American Meteorological <br />Society, 102-107. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />~ Throughout the 1980's, and continuing into the early 1990's, ground-based microwave radiometers have <br />been used on numerous wintertime weather modification projects to verify the presence of supercooled <br />liquid water (SL W) in orographic clouds that have been the target of cloud seeding experiments or <br />operations. Although the instrument is transportable, in the past radiometers have been stationary during <br />data collection periods. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />During the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project (Reynolds and Dennis, 1986) a dual-frequency radiometer was <br />positioned at several different locations on the windward side of the Sierra Nevada, but for the final four <br />winter field seasons the instrument was operated in a zenith-pointing mode near the main Sierra Nevada <br />crest. The reasoning was that, from this vantage point, the radiometer would detect cloud liquid that was <br />passing over the crest and not entering into the precipitation process. The SL W measured above the crest <br />location was, therefore, considered an estimate of the amount that might be tapped by an appropriate cloud <br />seeding technology. Heggli and Rauber (1988) summarize SLW occurrence at the crest site for different <br />types of storms. <br /> <br />Winter storm research studies in the mountains of Utah have taken advantage of the scanning capability of <br />ground-based radiometers. Rauber and Grant (1987) show the temporal evolution of SL W over the <br />upwind edge of the Tushar Mountains using data from a radiometer located at the base of the mountains, <br />which was scanned at an elevation angle of 20 degrees. They were able to detect azimuthal variations in <br />liquid amounts which were related to local topographic features. Sassen et al. (1990) used a midbarrier of <br />the same mountain range to clearly delineate the orographic stages of winter storms and further describe <br />topographic influences. In both cases, because of the relative shallowness of the liquid layers and the <br />steepness of the antenna elevation angle (>20 degrees), the radiometer measured microwave emission <br />from clouds only a few kilometers from the instrument site, and thus detected only very localized spatial <br />differences. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />In a fInal example of stationary radiometer applications, Huggins et al. (1<990) describe the evolution of <br />SL W from two locations using two radiometers. They documented differences in cloud liquid that <br />occurred over a mountain crest compared to a downwind valley for various winter stoims stages, and <br />during the passage of mesoscale cloud bands. This study revealed the potential for using multiple <br />radiometers to study the water budget of winter storms by measuring the development or depletion of <br />cloud liquid as a function of mountain barrier position. <br /> <br />During the 1991 Atmospheric Modification Research Program conducted cooperatively by the state of <br />Utah and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a new technique of mobile <br /> <br />i <br /> <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />37 <br />