Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.3 New Instruments and Observational Approaches <br /> <br />A number of new instruments and observational approaches were developed and deployed during the <br />NOAAlUtah AMP. For example, the mobile microwave radiometer (Huggins 1992, 1995, 1996; Wetzel <br />et al. 1996) provided a useful new way to map SL W over a mountain barrier. This approach is <br />particularly important when it is recognized that safety concerns often prevent instrumented aircraft from <br />flying low enough to monitor the orographic cloud SL W field in the region where most snow particles <br />grow. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Truck-mounted NCAR counters and SF 6 detectors were used in tracking plumes up and over the Plateau. <br />One truck carrying plume detection equipment also had a vane-mounted 2D-C laser probe on a mast above <br />it. The vane kept the probe pointed into the resultant wind as the truck was driven along the Plateau top, <br />while the 2D-C strobe rate was controlled by an anemometer. Tower-mounted 2D-C probes, also pointed <br />into the wind by vanes, provided similar ice particle observations at fixed locations (Super and Holroyd <br />- 1997).. Use of vane-moun..ted 2D-C probes provided a new and more accurate means of observing ice <br />crystals caused by seeding. As it became available, GPS (Global Positioning System) equipment was used <br />to record truck and aircraft positions. <br /> <br />Super (1993) reported on testing of an automated, self-antifreeze-rechargirig, recording precipitation gage <br />in a winter mountain environment. The gage was shown to be as accurate as the conventional Belfort <br />Universal gage which requires manual service and chart reduction. <br /> <br />Two methods of estimating AgI ice nuclei concentrations effective at cloud temperatures sampled by <br />aircraft were discussed by Super and Holroyd (1994). One method used tracer gas concentration <br />measurements while the other was based on NCAR counter observations. Both methods were compared <br />with the preferred, but often unavailable, approach of directly observing resulting ice particle <br />concentrations with a laser probe. The methods were found to provide reasonable first approximations for <br />the AgI aerosol and cloud conditions sampled by the study. <br /> <br />, The tracking of AgI and SF 6 tracer gas with instruments on aircraft and ground vel1icles was important in <br />many of the reported studies. The sometimes maligned NCAR acoustical ice nucleus counter was shown <br />to closely approximate AgI observations made by the "standard" CSU Cloud Simulation Laboratory <br />(DeMott et al. 1995). Of course, the counter must be in good condition and must be maintained by <br />someone knowledgeable in its proper operation. Several past applications used faulty NCAR counters or <br />insufficiently trained counter operators. The three NCAR counters used during the Plateau experiments <br />were often cross compared and found to be in good agreement. <br /> <br />Considerable effort was expended into calibrating and comparing fast response SF 6 detectors during the <br />field programs. Known concentrations ofthe gas were injected into the detectors at frequent intervals. <br />Like NCAR counters, these instruments also require significant maintenance and knowledgeable <br />operators. <br /> <br />The CSU laboratory studies by DeMott et al. (1995) provided a new calibration of the NA WC AgI <br />generator. It demonstrated that improvements had been made since the last calibration 'because warmer <br />temperature ice particle yields were significantly enhanced. Beside the generator calibration with the <br />standard AgI-NH4I-acetone-water solution used in Utah, one was made with a solution also containing <br />sodium iodide and paradichlorobenzene. . This latter solution was expected to produce a condensation- <br />freezing ice nuclei. Laboratory tests showed that ice crystal production rates were much faster with the <br />latter solution. The results imply that an order of magnitude increase in ice crystal formation could be <br /> <br />26 <br />