My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00293
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:33:58 PM
Creation date
3/5/2008 10:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Summary of the NOAA/Utah Atmospheric Modification Program: 1990-1996
Date
9/1/1998
State
UT
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;. <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />f <br />t <br />I <br />I. <br />L <br />;. <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />~ .,. <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />! <br />i <br />i <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. AVAILABILITY OF SUPERCOOLED LIQUID WATER _ <br /> <br />2.1 Background Information <br /> <br />It is well known that anecessary (but not sufficient) condition for winter orographic cloud seeding to be <br />effective is the availability ofSLW (Supercooled Liquid Water) in excess of that naturally converted to <br />snowfall.' Successful seeding also requires transport and dispersion of seeding agents into the SL W <br />clouds in sufficient concentrations to convert significant quantities of SL W to ice particles. Moreover, <br />the conversion must take place where sufficient time and distance remain for the seeded particles to grow <br />to snowflakes sizes which settle to the mountain surface before sublimating in the lee subsidence zone. <br />. All of this must happen in an ever-changing and complex airflow and cloud environment. While it is <br />sometimes convenient to consider winter orographic clouds as semi steady-state entities, they are actually <br />changing rapidly on a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. <br /> <br />-Many operational winter orographic cloud seeding programs and a number of experimental projects have <br />assumed the presence of abundant SLW. However, few programs have made significant efforts to test <br />this crucial assumption. The NOAAlUtah AMP put considerable effort into investigating spatial and <br />temporal SL W distributions, using both observations and sophisticated numerical modeling. Indeed, <br />documentation ofSLW was the first major scientific objective of this program. <br /> <br />Several of the, studies later summarized dealt with the importanttopic of SL W. These include Huggins <br />(1992), Sassen and Zhao (1993), Super and Huggins (1993), Super (1994), Huggins (1995), Super <br />(1995a), Huggins (1996), and Wetzel et at (1996). Observations ofSLW were made by tower-mounted <br />icing rate meters, sensors carried by the NOAA instrumented aircraft, and by both fIXed and mobile <br />microwave radiometers. A mobile microwave radiometer was first deployed in the field during the <br />NOAAlUtah AMP, as discussed by Huggins (1992, 1995) and Wetzel et al. (1996). It proved invaluable <br />in mapping SL W distributions over the Plateau. <br /> <br />The general portrayal of SL W over the Plateau in the articles just noted is similar to findings from other <br />mountainous regions, as reviewed by Super (1990). He noted that, "There is remarkable similarity among <br />the research results from the various mountain ranges. In general, SL W is available during at least <br />portions of many storms. It is usually concentrated in the lower layers, and especially in shallow clouds <br />with warm tops. Average integrated amounts are normally limited implying low cloud liquid water <br />contents, in agreement with aircraft observations." <br /> <br />The articles cited herein agree with the Super (1990) portrayal and expand upon it. Seasonally, a <br />significant portion of the SL W flux is not converted to snowfall during passage over the Plateau. This <br />finding suggests the availability of sufficient "raw material" for seeding to have a significant impact on <br />snowfall, provided that seeding can convert a significant portion of the SL W flux to snowfall. The <br />seasonal SL W flux is concentrated in a few large storms that are efficient(snowfall producers during <br />portions of their passages but inefficient during other phases. Super and Huggins (1993) considered the <br />SL W flu/( across a number of mountain barriers. They concluded that seeding may be -appropriate both <br />' when SL W is abundant and when it is limited. The relatively rare hours with large SL W amounts produce <br />significant flux. But the numerous hours with small SL W amounts also produce significant flux over the <br />course of an entire winter. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />I <br />I LIB. D^ ~'J <br />~ ~ \ r\ j '1 ~ <br /> <br /> <br />I MAV ? r- 1C.t:'Ci' <br />HI "- 0 )'.0',-',,", <br /> <br />I j i ; <br />I ! r.,.i'~~II',,:.r::r;:-;~..v,;:-;;~''''''''' r <br />\ v.1- \.l. - .,' ~, '..... {,: ".J:! <br />i _____;~.~c:f2~.:t.;~~.~. r:: . -."'" . :.- '~~Jer <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.