My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150259 Approval letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
C150259 Approval letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2011 3:38:45 PM
Creation date
3/4/2008 10:55:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150259
Contractor Name
Bijou Irrigation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
1
County
Morgan
Weld
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Background <br />The District owns and operates Empire Reservoir located west of Fort Morgan in Weld and <br />Morgan Counties, between I-76 on the south and US Highway 34 on the north. The District <br />provides irrigation water to a 19,200-acre service area in Morgan County, located between the <br />reservoir and the City of Fort Morgan. The District is a taxing district that levies a tax per acre <br />based on benefits received, not an ad valorem property tax. Water stored in the reservoir is <br />delivered to users througr� a sister company, Bijou Irrigation Company (Company), which <br />operates and maintains the distribution system, used for either direct irrigation or exchanges. <br />Empire Reservoir is an off-stream reservoir constructed in 1905. The dam is a Class 1 Dam with <br />a height of 35 feet and a crest width of 16 feet. There are essentially four separate dam <br />embankments that impound water, they are; the Outlet Dam of 2,300 feet, the Northwest Dam of <br />1,900 feet, the McIntyre Dam of 4,100 feet, and East Dam of 12,500 feet. <br />The reservoir was restricted by the State Engineer's Office (SEO) from 1985 to 2007, due to the <br />lack of an emergency spillway. In 2006 the District obtained a CWCB loan to construct an <br />emergency spillway, which was completed in spring of 2007, and the reservoir was allowed to <br />fill to its full gauge height 30.0. In the fall of 2007, the reservoir was restricted again to gauge <br />height 29.0 by the SEO, due to additional safety concerns. These concerns were the result of <br />significant wave erosion occurring along the East Dam, resulting in sections of the existing <br />parapet wall failing and significant erosion occurring along the toe of the dam embankment. <br />Discussion <br />Due to additional work not budgeted in the original cost estimate, weather conditions, proj ect <br />location, and unforeseen variations in cost for specific items during construction, the overall cost <br />of the project has increased significantly. <br />To address the 2007 restriction, the District hired Applegate Group, Inc. to prepare construction <br />plans for the rehabilitation of the East Dam. The construction plans were approved by the SEO in <br />December 2007. Given the late December 2007 approval, the District was faced with a difficult <br />decision of either delaying construction until the fall of 2008 or placing temporary fill over the <br />east embankment with SEO approval, therefore allowing the District to fill to gauge height 30.0 <br />and recovering an additiona12,700 acre-feet of storage. Given the economic impact of reducing <br />the available water by 2,700 acre-feet, the District elected to place temporary fill along the east <br />embankment, with the understanding that this material would have to be removed and placed <br />again in accordance with the design specifications in the fall of 2008. The cost of placing the <br />temporary dam embankment was approximately $385,000 or about $143 per acre-feet of <br />reclaimed storage. <br />During the summer of 2008 the District's design engineer, re-evaluated the initial idea of just <br />repairing the 1,250 feet of existing concrete parapet wall. The District did not want to get into <br />another position of having the reservoir restricted due to the failure of any portion of the existing <br />parapet wall. Given the age and condition of the existing wall, the design engineer could not <br />effectively address the District's concerns without replacing the entire concrete parapet wall. <br />Based on the engineer's evaluation, it was determined to be more economical to remove the <br />entire concrete parapet wall and replace it with a sloped rip rap section, consistent with the <br />configuration of the reconstructed East Dam. The cost of removing the concrete parapet wall <br />and reconstructing the dam embankment is estimated at $422,000 and is currently under <br />construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.