Laserfiche WebLink
'� <br />k , <br />' <br />i <br />�, ' ; . <br />, �. <br />' <br />r ^ <br />hindrance or accidemt. Farmers .Ins Group v Aistrict Co urt, 507 �.2d 865, (Calo. 1973); <br />Lamberr v. Supreme C 'ourt of Golorado, 4�4 U.S. f3'78 (1973); .Mover v. Emnire Lod�e <br />Homeowner's As�soc., 7II P.3d 313 (Colo. 2003). <br />12. In gene�l, most such situat�ons involve wa£oreseen occurrences. Zt is impossable <br />' to desczibe the myriad sihaation�s sb�owing excusable neglect, but, in general, most situations <br />imvolve unforeseen occurrences such as pexsonal tragedY, illness, £axnily death, destruction of <br />files, and other similar situations whi.ch would cause a reasonably prudent pezson to ovexlook a <br />' requixed d�adline date �in the perEo�ance of sozzae responsibi��ty. Farmers Ins. Gro� v. District <br />urt, supra; Lambert v Supr�me Court o Colarado, su�za. <br />' <br /> � <br />13. �cotestanYs reliance on the Attorney Genexa�'s Office to pxepare the extension to <br />the stipulation, the Attamey General's Office being too busy to ckaft the extension, and Cowc�sel <br />having �oaoved out of st�te were unavoidable hindrances leading to Protestant overlooking the <br />required deadliwe and resultiug in excusable neglect. <br />, WHEREFORE, Protestant respec�tfiilly requests that this CowR pursuant to CRCP 6(b)(2) accept <br />the late Motion to appz+�ve Second ,Amendment to StiPulation and Agreement fi�ed by the parties <br /> i on Decembez 9, 2005 �n the grounds of excusable neglect. <br />Dated tbas third day of Jaauary, 2006. <br />Rosemmrie �ieidenreich Parkar, #31750 <br />Attomey �or Frotestant <br />PO Box I25 <br />�xeeburg, IL 62243 <br />Phone: (618) 539-9956 <br />Fax: (6] 8) 539-9954 <br />Copy of the foregang mailec Yo ail Counsef <br />of Record, Water Referee, Div . n�� r <br />and State Engineer Date <br />pe�wty Clertc, Water Diw. 5 <br />`---] <br />