Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TASK 3. A final appraisal ofthe two sample agricultural water suppliers chosen for the study, <br />including; 1) a review of proposed alternatives for pressurized irrigation facilities, 2) where and when to <br />begin and how to phase the development of their respective dual systems, determine most desirable <br />locations for piloting a dual system, survey preferences for inclusion into the dual system service area, <br />summarize State Engineer Office concerns regarding possible water rights issues and how to address or <br />minimize them. The objective ofthis activity is to provide the sample enterprises with all but a complete <br />and specific engineering design of their proposed dual system. <br /> <br />Method: These activities will be conducted in cooperation with the management staff <br />and board of directors ofthe sample enterprises. <br /> <br />TASK 4. Observations and comments from a workshop for board members of the two sample <br />enterprises. The workshop will include visits by enterprise managers with currently operating dual <br />systems. The purpose ofthe workshop will be to assess current designs, management practices, customer <br />satisfaction, agricultural water user concerns, partnerships with local jurisdictions, financing and billing- <br />record keeping, ordinances, covenants, etc. <br /> <br />Method: Visits by managers from agricultural irrigation water suppliers operating dual systems <br />elsewhere in the Rocky Mountain region, including the Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association <br />(Montrose, Colorado), Grand Valley Irrigation Company (Grand Junction, Colorado), and Davis and <br />Weber Counties Canal Company (Sunset, Utah). <br />