PROJ01959 ‎(2)‎

• Contract/PO #: C150131A
• Contractor Name: Paonia, Town of
• Contract Type: Loan
• Water District: 0
• Loan Projects - Doc Type: Feasibility Study

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Feasibility Report for Improvement of Paonia's Water Supply System
Town of Paonia
April 21,2000

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)

Page

6. COMPARISON OF FIRM YIELD AND FUTURE DEMANDS ............. 6-1
6.1 Average Annual Demands Comparison .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.2 Peak Monthly Demands Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1

6.3 Tap Deficit .................................................. 6-1

7. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES.. . . . .. ... . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . 7-1
7.1 Formulation of Alternatives ..................................... 7-1
7.2 Study Approach for Evaluating the Primary Alternatives .............. 7-3
7.3 Todd Reservoir. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6
7.4 Enlarging Lone Cabin Reservoir ................................. 7-6
7.5 Stephens Spring Reservoir ..................................... 7-13
7.6 Comparison of Alternatives .................................... 7-15

8. PERMITTING AND REGULATORY ISSUES ...........................8-1
8.1 U.S. Forest Service.................................... ...".... 8-1
8.2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 8-1
8.3 Colorado State Engineers Office ................................. 8-1

9. INSTITUTIONAL CONSiDERATIONS..................... ........... 9-1

10. FINANCIAL PLAN ............................................... 10-1
10.1 Estimated Cost .............................................. 10-1
10.2 Cost Escalation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10-1
10.3 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10-1
lOA Proposed Financial Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10-1
10.5 Assessment of Financial Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10-5

11. CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 11-1

12. RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 12-1

13. REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 13-1

~ GEl Consultants, Inc.

-lV-

J: IPROJECTSIQ9368IReportsIFeasibilily. wpd