My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ01940 (3)
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
PROJ01940 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:34 AM
Creation date
2/26/2008 1:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153372
Contractor Name
Hyannis Reservoir Company
Water District
0
County
Jackson
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />IJIIIIIIL' ! <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />, .. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />HYANNIS PEAK ro~SERVOIR <br /> <br />Conclusions <br /> <br />" .1' <br />... <br /> <br />.', <br /> <br />Conclusions developed durin~ the Hyannis Peak Reservoir <br />Preliminary Feasibility Study are based on data that, due <br />to lack of direct observations, do not in all cases meet <br />state guidelines. This is particularly evident in the stream <br />flow claculations and the geologic investigations. However, <br />without waiting 20 to 30 ~ears' to gather the recommended <br />stream flow information it is necessary to develop a "best <br />estimate" flow rate. In addition, geologic investigations, <br />which greatly effect construction design and cost, are not <br />com1?lete without subsurface studiE~s. Therefore, in order <br />to perform the needed benefit to cost ratios required to <br />obtain funding, desien and cost estimates are presented in <br />this study. Using these estimates, benefit to cost ratios <br />greater than one in irrigation, herd increase, and calf sales <br />are determined. It is therefore the conclusion of this study <br />that the Hyannis Peak Project appears to be a beneficial and <br />cost effective project. <br /> <br />. 'I <br /><I <br /> <br />':'J <br />. i <br /> <br />.,.'! <br />" , <br /> <br />...;.. <br /> <br />, c..:j <br /> <br />1""1 <br />';.':1 <br /> <br />,., <br />:1 <br />'. '~;'J <br />;......j <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />Based on the conclusions of this study it is recommended <br />that funding for geologic investigations be allocated. The <br />results of these investigations will be used to more accurately <br />define desip,n criteria and constru.ction costs and therefore <br />future benefits. <br /> <br />-~';'I <br /><J <br /> <br />;.~:j <br />:"'! <br /> <br />:~:'i <br />,,,;! <br /> <br />'}1 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />l <br />I <br /> <br />,', I <br />.....' <br /> <br />:.:'; <br /> <br />liMO. " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.