Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />e <br /> <br />1_ <br /> <br />direct violation of the terms of the Compact. They therefore argued that curtailment orders made pursuant <br />to the 1980 Operating Plan were invalid. <br /> <br />Aftertrial, the water judge ruled, among other things, that Highland and Nine Mile were not injured <br />by the 1980 Operating Plan and did not have legal standing to challenge the 1980 Operating Plan. The <br />decision was appealed by Highland and Nine Mile to the Colorado Supreme Court. The Colorado <br />Supreme Court reversed the decision of the trial court, held that Highland and Nine Mile had standing to <br />raise this defense, and remanded the case to the trial court. See People ex rel. Simpson v. Highland <br />Irrigation Company, 893 P .2d 122 (Colo. 1995). On remand, the water judge rejected Highland and <br />Nine Mile's defense that the 1980 Operating Plan was invalid and entered an injunction against further <br />violation of the State Engineer's curtailment orders. Highland again appealed to the Colorado Supreme <br />Court. That court upheld both the validity of the 1980 Operating Plan and the trial court's inju.'lction against <br />Highland and Nine Mile. See People ex rel. Simpson v. Highland Irrigation Company, 917 P .2d 1242 <br />(Colo. 1996). <br /> <br />D. The 1997 Offset Account in John Martin Reservoir <br /> <br />On March 11, 1997, the Administration approved anew storage account in John Martin Reservoir <br />known as the "Offset Account in John Martin Reservoir for Colorado Pumping" (the "Offset Account"). <br />The Offset Account is 20,000 acre-feet and it is separate from and in addition to the accounts established <br />by the 1980 Operating Plan. The stated purpose of the Offset Account is to replace any depletions to <br />usable state-line flows caused by Colorado's allowance of post-Compact well pumping in excess of <br />Colorado's annual pre-Compact well pumping entitlement of 15,000 acre-feet. It operates by delivering <br />replacement water to the state line or by making replacement water available in the Offset Account where <br />it can be released at the call of Kansas. <br /> <br />The only water that may be delivered to the Offset Account is water approved for that purpose by <br />the Colorado State Engineer. Evaporation losses to the water in the Offset Account is charged to <br />Colorado until the water is released or transferred to Kansas or unless other conditions stated in the Offset <br />Account Resolution are satisfIed. Up to 1,500 acre-feet per year may be delivered to the Offset Account <br />for purposes of replacing depletions to Conservation Storage caused by post-Compact well pumping. Any <br />transit losses incurred onreleases of state-line return flow replacement water delivered to the Offset <br />Account must be made up by the entity delivering such water to the Offset Account. <br /> <br />In order to be able to use the Offset Account, Colorado or its water users must deliver 500 acre- <br />feet offully-consumable water to the account by April 1 of each year for use by Kansas as a prerequisite <br />to the rightto store 10,000 acre-feet. Five percent (5%) of all deliveries over 10,000 acre-feet to the <br />Offset Account are likewise allocated to Kansas. The 500 acre-feet and the fIve percent (5%) of amounts <br />in excess of 1 0,000 acre-feet is the "Storage Charge Water" allocated to Kansas, not to offset depletions <br />to usable state-line flows, but instead "as part of Kansas' equitable share of the benefIts arising from the <br />creation of the Offset Account" in John Martin Reservoir. The Resolution creating the Offset Account <br /> <br />Page 15 of 66 <br />