My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150099 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
C150099 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 8:06:35 AM
Creation date
2/21/2008 4:06:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150099
Contractor Name
Amity Mutual Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
67
County
Kiowa
Bill Number
HB 02-1152
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
u�_'� <br />Amity Mutual Irrigation Co. Agenda Item 22d. <br />November 19-20, 2001 <br />Water Riqhts <br />The Company owns water storage rights in the Neenoshe Reservoir, as well as direct flow <br />rights in the Amity Canai. The Neenoshe Reservoir has a capacity of 60,618 ac-ft and the <br />Company has an 1150-cfs direct flow water right in the Amity Canai. Water rights owned by the <br />Company are shown in Table 1: . _ <br />Table1: Water Rights of the Amity Mutual Irrigation Company <br />Proiect Description <br />Three alternatives were analyzed in the feasibility study: <br />1. No Action <br />2. Rehabilitate the outlets and construct a new stilling basin ($400,000) <br />3. Replacement of the outlet system ($960,000) <br />�. <br />Alternative 3, Replacement of the outlet system, was ruled out because it would increase the <br />cost of the project significantly with little added benefit. Alternative 2, Rehabilitate the outlets <br />and construct a new stilling basin, was the alternative with the least overall cost that was a <br />permanent solution to the problem. This alternatiue is considered the preferred alternative. The <br />no-action alternative was considered unacceptable since it would mean that the reservoir would <br />remain restricted to gage 23.5 feet, an annual loss of approximately 8,000 ac-ft of storage. This <br />would be a significant hardship for the shareholders. <br />Selecfed Alternafive 2 consists of relining the four outlets with 27-inch steel pipe, grouted in <br />place. New 30" by 30" sluice gates with new manual hoists will be installed on the upstream <br />headwall. The stilling basin will be demolished and rebuilt of reinforced concrete. A toe drain <br />with engineered filter will be incorporated into the stilling basin design. <br />The implementation schedule calls for completion of financing arrangements in spring 2002. <br />Final engineering design will be completed by fali 2002. Constructis�n will be completed in fall- <br />winter 2002. <br />Financial Analysic <br />The total estimated cost of the project is $400,000, and the water is used for agricultural <br />purposes. Staff is recommending a 30-year loan in maximum amount of $360,000 <br />(approximately 90% of estimated project cost.) <br />2 <br />There is a one-time refill right to the Great Plains Reservoir System. Water is delivered through <br />the Fort Lyons Canal to the Kicking Bird Canal, and then to the Reservoir system. The <br />Company has diverted an average of 54,460 ac-ft over the past 10 years, according to State <br />Engineer Records. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.