My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12647 (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12647 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:18:54 PM
Creation date
2/19/2008 2:39:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.400
Description
Colorado River Operations and Accounting - Deliveries to Mexico
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1999
Author
Environmental Defense Fund
Title
A Delta Once More - Restoring Riparian and Wetland Habitat in the Colorado River Delta - Environmental Defense Fund - 06-01-99
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />A new wastewater treatment plant in Mexicali - to be <br />constructed in 2001- will improve the quality of some <br />of the effluent now sent via the New River to the Salton <br />Sea. <br /> <br />[See Box 1.] The plant is presently designed to discharge <br />treated effluent into the New River, where it will empty <br />into the Salton Sea. If instead this treated effluent is <br />discharged into the Rio Hardy basin, the Rio Hardy <br />wetlands might serve as part of the wastewater treat- <br />ment process. Both the Mexican government and the <br />u.s. EP A have indicated an interest in exploring options <br />for using treated water to enhance delta environments <br />(Eberhardt, 1996; Penas, 1999). <br /> <br />Yuma Desalting Plant <br /> <br />A proposal by the BaR to operate the Yuma Desalting <br />Plant and market the water would divert agricultural <br />wastewater flows from Ia Cienega de Santa Clara and <br />replace them with concentrated brine. [See Box 4.] This <br />would reduce the area of the wetland by 40 percent, <br />impacting wildlife, as well as the residents ?f nearby <br />Johnson ejido who serve as local ecotour gUIdes. Any <br />decision to operate the Yuma Desalting Plant will <br />require an environmental assessment and should require <br />that water be found to support la Cienega de Santa Clara. <br />This water should not be counted against the u.s. treaty <br />obligation to deliver Colorado River water to Mexico. <br /> <br />Lower Colorado Conservation Planning <br /> <br />The lower Colorado River basin has recently become a <br />focus for cooperative conservation efforts in the US., <br />but to date, participants have been reluctant to include <br /> <br />the delta in planning efforts for the lower basin. One <br />potential source of support for delta ecosy~tems co~ld <br />be a system of off-site mitigation or mitigatIon bankmg <br />for lower basin water users whose diversions and <br />deliveries affect endangered species. Because delta wet- <br />lands are more extensive and in better condition than <br />riparian areas along the US. stretch of the Colorado <br />River, the delta is an important reservoir of species and <br />habitats that are threatened or endangered elsewhere. <br />The US. Fish and Wildlife Service is the lead federal <br />agency in the process, and could make the determina- <br />tion to include the delta in the scope of its overall <br />conservation program for the lower Colorado. <br /> <br /> <br />All American Canal and <br />Delivery of Water to Mexico <br /> <br />Colorado River water is guaranteed to Mexico in the <br />1944 water treaty with the United States.56 Mexico relies <br />on groundwater pumped from the border region to <br />augment its supplies, but plans by California and <br />Nevada to line the nearby All American Canal will <br />reduce seepage into these aquifers. Mexico has opposed <br />these plans on the grounds that the seepage is <br />" grandfathered" - in other words, a known conditio~ <br />that existed at the time the original treaty was negotI- <br />ated, and therefore water to which Mexico is entitled. <br />In addition, Mexico has requested that its entire <br />allocation of water from the Colorado RiveT be <br />delivered at the Northern International Boundary, one <br />of two sites where water is currently deliveredY <br />Resolution of these issues will require negotiations <br />between the two countries and a possible amendment <br />to the 1944 treaty. <br /> <br />56 See Chapter 2, notes 15 and 20 for an explanation of U.S. treaty obligations to Mexico. <br />57 See Chapter 2 for further discussion. <br /> <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.