Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Also within SEMARNAP is the National Water <br />Commission (CNA), which has nearly complete <br />jurisdiction over water resources and planning in <br />Mexico. CNA builds potable water, sanitation, waste- <br />water-treatment, irrigation, drainage, and flood control <br />systems. It administers Mexico's system of water rights <br />and pumping permits, and shares (with INE) responsi- <br />bility for the nation's water quality. CNA has recently <br />attempted to decentralize its decision making by <br />establishing local watershed councils. State and <br />municipal governments have little local control over <br />water resources (Mumme, 1996).49 <br /> <br />In the U.S., myriad agencies have some jurisdiction over <br />activities in, or impacting, the delta. Of these, the most <br />influential include the U.s. Environmental Protection <br />Agency, which regulates water quality, and is mandated <br />to participate in international efforts such as Border XXI. <br />Two U.s. Department of Interior agencies play critical <br />roles. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) admin- <br />isters the Endangered Species Act, and is mandated to <br />review federal actions for adverse impacts to endan- <br />gered species (Mumme, 1996). The Bureau of <br />Reclamation (BaR) operates the dams on the Colorado <br />River in the U.S., and is planning to conduct a needs <br />assessment of the Colorado River delta in cooperation <br />with Mexican agencies under the auspices of the IBWC <br />(Johnson, 1999). The Lower Colorado Multi-Species <br />Conservation Program (MSCP) was created by the FWS <br />with lower basin states and water users to address <br />endangered species concerns in the lower basin (Pontius, <br />1997). MSCP has been asked to consider impacts of <br />management on the delta, but declined (Johnson, 1999). <br /> <br />li'ibes, Basin States, and Local Communities <br /> <br />Beyond the federal governments, numerous authorities <br />playa role in Colorado River management. Thirty-two <br />tribes reside within the basin, and many have Colorado <br />River water rights that date to the establishment of their <br />reservations or to more recent court decisions. Together <br />these tribes assert rights to more than 2 maf <br />(2.5 x 109 m3) of water50, but little has been developed. <br />Many tribes are looking for ways to secure economic <br /> <br />benefits from their entitlements other than traditional <br />water supply development. For example, the ten tribes <br />of the Colorado River Tribal Partnership formed a coa- <br />lition to secure, develop, and market their water rights <br />(Colorado River Tribal Partnership, n.d.). Any negotia- <br />tion over management of Colorado River water for the <br />benefit of delta ecosystems that affects tribal rights will <br />require tribal participation. <br /> <br />The seven u.s. states wield considerable decision- <br />making power over water allocations, flows, storage, <br />management of endangered species concerns, and <br />environmental restoration. The two Mexican states play <br />a more limited role, with most decision-making <br />authority resting with CNA (Mumme, 1996). Local <br />communities in the delta region as yet have a limited <br />voice, but they are likely to become a more vocal <br />presence as conservation interests engage them and <br />inform them of the impacts of water management on <br />their lives. EDF, in collaboration with others, has con- <br />vened outreach workshops with communities in the <br />delta to increase communication between conservation <br />interests and local people (see Appendix q. <br /> <br /> <br />Nongovernmental Organizations <br /> <br />A number of nongovernmental organizations (NGO's) <br />that focus on the environment, as well as academics from <br />universities in both the U.S. and Mexico, have invested <br />time and effort in documenting the values and chal- <br />lenges of the Colorado River delta. While these <br />organizations cannot directly affect how the resource is <br />managed, they are important voices in the debate over <br />the future of the resource. <br /> <br />Of the many Mexican and u.s. NGO's that have worked <br />on the delta, several may playa critical role as alterna- <br />tives are analyzed and discussed. Based in the U.s., EDF <br />will continue to devote staff time and resources to the <br />challenge of sustaining the delta's ecosystem. Develop- <br />ing a field-tested water balance model for the delta is a <br />current research priority. NGO's engaged in delta <br />conservation include the Sonoran Institute, the Pacific <br />Institute for Studies in Development, the Environment, <br />and Security (Pacific Institute), the Defenders of <br /> <br />49 In an attempt to enhance the influence of user groups and allow some local control of water resources, Mexico has District Water Committees (Comites <br />Hidraulicos) composed of water users. In addition, River Basin Councils were created in 1992 to help decentralize water management. CNA sits on both the <br />irrigation district committees and the river basin councils. <br />50 This figure represents rights asserted by the tribes rather than adjudicated rights. <br /> <br /> <br />36 <br />