<br />Also within SEMARNAP is the National Water
<br />Commission (CNA), which has nearly complete
<br />jurisdiction over water resources and planning in
<br />Mexico. CNA builds potable water, sanitation, waste-
<br />water-treatment, irrigation, drainage, and flood control
<br />systems. It administers Mexico's system of water rights
<br />and pumping permits, and shares (with INE) responsi-
<br />bility for the nation's water quality. CNA has recently
<br />attempted to decentralize its decision making by
<br />establishing local watershed councils. State and
<br />municipal governments have little local control over
<br />water resources (Mumme, 1996).49
<br />
<br />In the U.S., myriad agencies have some jurisdiction over
<br />activities in, or impacting, the delta. Of these, the most
<br />influential include the U.s. Environmental Protection
<br />Agency, which regulates water quality, and is mandated
<br />to participate in international efforts such as Border XXI.
<br />Two U.s. Department of Interior agencies play critical
<br />roles. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) admin-
<br />isters the Endangered Species Act, and is mandated to
<br />review federal actions for adverse impacts to endan-
<br />gered species (Mumme, 1996). The Bureau of
<br />Reclamation (BaR) operates the dams on the Colorado
<br />River in the U.S., and is planning to conduct a needs
<br />assessment of the Colorado River delta in cooperation
<br />with Mexican agencies under the auspices of the IBWC
<br />(Johnson, 1999). The Lower Colorado Multi-Species
<br />Conservation Program (MSCP) was created by the FWS
<br />with lower basin states and water users to address
<br />endangered species concerns in the lower basin (Pontius,
<br />1997). MSCP has been asked to consider impacts of
<br />management on the delta, but declined (Johnson, 1999).
<br />
<br />li'ibes, Basin States, and Local Communities
<br />
<br />Beyond the federal governments, numerous authorities
<br />playa role in Colorado River management. Thirty-two
<br />tribes reside within the basin, and many have Colorado
<br />River water rights that date to the establishment of their
<br />reservations or to more recent court decisions. Together
<br />these tribes assert rights to more than 2 maf
<br />(2.5 x 109 m3) of water50, but little has been developed.
<br />Many tribes are looking for ways to secure economic
<br />
<br />benefits from their entitlements other than traditional
<br />water supply development. For example, the ten tribes
<br />of the Colorado River Tribal Partnership formed a coa-
<br />lition to secure, develop, and market their water rights
<br />(Colorado River Tribal Partnership, n.d.). Any negotia-
<br />tion over management of Colorado River water for the
<br />benefit of delta ecosystems that affects tribal rights will
<br />require tribal participation.
<br />
<br />The seven u.s. states wield considerable decision-
<br />making power over water allocations, flows, storage,
<br />management of endangered species concerns, and
<br />environmental restoration. The two Mexican states play
<br />a more limited role, with most decision-making
<br />authority resting with CNA (Mumme, 1996). Local
<br />communities in the delta region as yet have a limited
<br />voice, but they are likely to become a more vocal
<br />presence as conservation interests engage them and
<br />inform them of the impacts of water management on
<br />their lives. EDF, in collaboration with others, has con-
<br />vened outreach workshops with communities in the
<br />delta to increase communication between conservation
<br />interests and local people (see Appendix q.
<br />
<br />
<br />Nongovernmental Organizations
<br />
<br />A number of nongovernmental organizations (NGO's)
<br />that focus on the environment, as well as academics from
<br />universities in both the U.S. and Mexico, have invested
<br />time and effort in documenting the values and chal-
<br />lenges of the Colorado River delta. While these
<br />organizations cannot directly affect how the resource is
<br />managed, they are important voices in the debate over
<br />the future of the resource.
<br />
<br />Of the many Mexican and u.s. NGO's that have worked
<br />on the delta, several may playa critical role as alterna-
<br />tives are analyzed and discussed. Based in the U.s., EDF
<br />will continue to devote staff time and resources to the
<br />challenge of sustaining the delta's ecosystem. Develop-
<br />ing a field-tested water balance model for the delta is a
<br />current research priority. NGO's engaged in delta
<br />conservation include the Sonoran Institute, the Pacific
<br />Institute for Studies in Development, the Environment,
<br />and Security (Pacific Institute), the Defenders of
<br />
<br />49 In an attempt to enhance the influence of user groups and allow some local control of water resources, Mexico has District Water Committees (Comites
<br />Hidraulicos) composed of water users. In addition, River Basin Councils were created in 1992 to help decentralize water management. CNA sits on both the
<br />irrigation district committees and the river basin councils.
<br />50 This figure represents rights asserted by the tribes rather than adjudicated rights.
<br />
<br />
<br />36
<br />
|