Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OJJ3:.4 <br /> <br />In summary, the delta's wetlands and riparian zone <br />currently cover 150,000 acres (60,000 ha). A quarter of <br />this is high biomass, woody riparian vegetation, and <br />16,000 acres (6500 ha) is emergent marshland dominated <br />by cattail and other hydrophytes. Most of the remain- <br />ing area is more sparsely vegetated by scrub associations <br />such as tamarisk, arrowweed, and halophyte shrubs. <br />Approximately 2200 acres (900 ha) of salt flats in the <br />tidal portion of the river are covered by Palmer's salt <br />grass, a grass endemic to the northern Gulf of <br />California. The woody riparian vegetation is dominated <br />by the native cottonwoods and willow in the northern <br />part of the riparian zone, but by the more salt-tolerant <br />tamarisk, a nonnative, in the southern part of the delta <br />as the river approaches the tidal zone. The riparian zone <br />of the Colorado River in Mexico has larger areas of <br />native riparian forest and marsh habitats than the <br />upstream stretch in the United States. Based on projec- <br />tions from other studies on the lower Colorado River, <br />delta riparian vegetation can potentially support 120,000 <br />migratory and resident summer birds. Marsh habitat <br />supports several endangered avian and fish species. <br />These observations point to the high ecological value of <br />the Colorado River delta. <br /> <br />THREATS TO DELTA HABITATS <br /> <br />The principal threats to delta habitats are insufficient <br />and unreliable water supplies and their relatively poor <br />water quality. Satellite and aerial photography indicates <br />that most of the present delta vegetation has been re- <br />stored and maintained by flood releases over the last 20 <br />years (Glenn et aI., 1996). A 1972 series of aerial photo- <br />graphs showed that most of the riparian zone was bare <br />soil and sparse mesquite trees. A satellite image taken <br />in May 1992 after four years without flow in the river <br />showed high-density vegetation in Zones 1 to 5 confined <br />to the edges of the river channels. Increased salinity due <br />to tidal flows had allowed tamarisk to invade. <br /> <br />By contrast, after flood releases in 1997 and early 1998, <br />high-intensity riparian vegetation (R1) occupied <br />approximately 30 percent of the floodplain, with evi- <br />dence of widespread seed germination of native trees <br /> <br />ENVlRONllriENTAL DEFENSE FUND <br /> <br />as well as tamarisk. Data for 1997 and 1998 also show <br />that peak flows of3500-7000 cfs (100-200 m3 Is) are suf- <br />ficient to inundate nearly the entire floodplain between <br />the levee system below Morelos Dam, and to dilute sig- <br />nificantly the salinity of ocean water in the tidal zone. <br />In the absence of such flooding, the marine influence <br />extends 34 miles (56 km) upriver from the mouth (Payne <br />et aI., 1992). Thus, it appears that the reestablishment of <br />native forest species in Zones 1 to 3 has been a direct <br />consequence of the return of overbank flooding below <br />Morelos Dam since the filling of Lake Powell. <br /> <br />Several potential changes could effect the precarious <br />health of the delta. Reductions in water supplies avail- <br />able to the delta could occur under several scenarios. <br />Additional storage and diversion projects in the basin <br />(e.g., the Animas-La Plata in Colorado) are still under <br />consideration. Were such projects built, they could vir- <br />tually eliminate the kind of flows that have been found <br />to support the regeneration of native trees in the delta. <br />Similarly, a proposal by California to change the criteria <br />used by the Bureau of Reclamation to define periods of <br />surplus and shortage would trigger greater releases for <br />consumptive use and increase the frequency of periods <br />without flood releases. Finally, if the Yuma desalting <br />plant comes on line, it will have devastating conse- <br />quences for la Cienega de Santa Clara, which will receive <br />the plant's concentrated brine waste (Glenn et aI., 1992). <br />[See Box4.] <br /> <br />Water quality threats to the delta include high concen- <br />trations of selenium in the Rio Hardy IRio Colorado <br />wetlands and la Cienega de Santa Clara,37 and high <br />salinity. Selenium is present throughout the lower <br />Colorado River watershed as a naturally occurring trace <br />element that is harmless in low concentrations but can <br />be toxic to fish and wildlife at higher concentrations as <br />it accumulates in the food chain (Presser, 1994; Presser <br />et aI., 1994; Ohlendorf, 1986). It often is found in soils in <br />arid and semiarid climates, particularly in ancient sea- <br />beds. Selenium is dissolved by irrigation water, and then <br />evaporation can increase its concentration in both wa- <br />ter and sediments. In the lower Colorado, selenium <br />levels are highest in oxbow lakes and backwaters <br /> <br /> <br />37 Water sampling and analysis was carried out at 19 sites along the Rio Hardy/Rio Colorado wetlands in July and August 1998, and at 10 sites in la <br />Cienega de Santa Clara in 1996 and 1997. The sampling and analysis followed EPA and Arizona Department of Environmental Quality procedures. The <br />results for the Rio Hardy/Rio Colorado are summarized in "Information Database and Local Outreach Program for the Restoration of the Hardy River Wet- <br />lands, Lower Colorado River Delta, Baja California and Sonora Mexico" (Valdes-Casillas et aI., 1998a). The results of research on water quality in the Cienega <br />are summarized in "Bioaccumulation of Selenium in the Cil~nega de Santa Clara. Colorado River Delta. Sonora, Mexico:' (Garcia-Hernandez, 1998). <br /> <br />29 <br />