Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />001575 <br /> <br />Tables <br /> <br />Table 1. Segment characteristics of the Colorado River in Marble and upper Grand Canyons. . . . . . . 8 <br /> <br />Table 2. Depth to bedrock in the valley of the Colorado River. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 <br /> <br />Table 3. Characteristics of the 5 reaches in Marble and upper Grand Canyons where fine-grain alluvium <br />was mapped and analyzed in a GIS. The sixth reach was Glen Canyon.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 <br /> <br />Table 4. Estimates of the potential fine-sediment storage volume in 9 EDZs.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 <br /> <br />Table 5. Estimates of the average change in fine sediment thickness in Marble and upper Grand Canyons <br />under various scenarios of seasonal sediment accumulation, relative proportion of accumulation <br />stored in eddies and the main channel, and proportion of the main channel where storage occurs. . 28 <br /> <br />Table 6. Locations of cross-sections in Glen Canyon indicating which cross-sections were surveyed each <br />year and the dates of those measurements if known.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 29 <br /> <br />Table 7. Summary of channel cross-section data at Marble Canyon Dam sites.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 <br /> <br />Table 8. Comparison of the area of sand depicted in photographs taken during the Second Powell Expedi- <br />tion and matched by Stephens and Shoemaker (1987).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 <br /> <br />Table 9. Summary of changes in sand bars depicted in historical photo matches taken by Turner and <br />Karpiscak (1980).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 <br /> <br />Table 10. Aerial photographs analyzed in this study.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 <br /> <br />Table 11. Description of units in pre- and post-controlled flood geomorphic maps. . . . . . . 71 <br /> <br />Table 12. Areas above 708 m3/s stage and between 227 and 708 m3/s stages, as surveyed by NAU and <br />estimated from aerial photographs.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 <br /> <br />Table 13. Error matrix of the agreement between areas surveyed by NAU and estimated by USU.. . . 73 <br /> <br />Table 14. Reach-average change in eddy sand bars between pre-dam photographs and the 1990s.. . .. 78 <br /> <br />Table 15. Eddy deposition zones (EDZs) that increased or decreased in area between average pre-dam <br />conditions and the 1990s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 <br /> <br />Table 16. Summary of temporal trends in area and volume of sand in two elevation zones at sites mea- <br />sured by NAU.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 <br /> <br />Table 17. Mean and median area of post-dam flood sands above the elevation of the stage of 708 m3/s at <br />study sites in Marble Canyon.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 <br /> <br />Table 18. Mean and median area of sand in the fluctuating flow zone, below the elevation of the stage of <br />708 m3/s and above the stage of 227 m3/s, at study sites in Marble Canyon.. . . . . . . . . . . 90 <br /> <br />Table 19. Estimates of loss of fine sediment from eddies between the pre-dam era and the 1990s. . . . . ., 91 <br /> <br />Contents VII <br />