Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001752 <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />associated with low-level, high resolution photogrammetry are too great to detect meaningful <br />changes in arroyo depths and nick point migration at the level most desirable for tracking erosion <br />at archaeological sites (less than 20 cm vertical change); however, they noted that newly <br />developed remote sensing technologies such as LiDAR may be able to provide remote data with <br />the necessary accuracy. <br />Another cultural PEP recommendation that was implemented in FY2002 involved the <br />preparation of a comprehensive research design to guide future research and monitoring <br />initiatives in the river corridor. The research design was identified by the PEP as a key <br />component of the Historic Preservation Plan mandated as a stipulation of the current P A. <br />Although originally intended to serve the specific needs of the P A program, GCMRC expanded <br />the scope and purpose of the research design to includt~ a framework for researching and <br />monitoring the full spectrum of cultural resources found within the CRE, in order to meet not <br />only the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act but also the broader mandates of <br />the Grand Canyon Protection Act. A draft version of the research design was submitted to <br />GCMRC and reviewed by independent scientists and PA signatories in spring, 2003; the final <br />research design was published in 2004 (Fairley, 2004). <br />Recent and Ongoing Cultural Resource Investigations: Current resource monitoring of <br />archaeological and traditionally-valued resources indicate that archaeological resources continue <br />to be impacted by physical processes such as surface erosion and gullying in both the Grand and <br />Glen Canyon areas. In the CRE, some surface erosion is clearly due to natural processes that are <br />unrelated to dam operations; however, other sediment I!oss from archaeological sites is believed <br />to be related to dam operations. The contributing effects of dam operations to the ongoing <br />erosion of the river corridor's alluvial terraces (where many archaeological sites) are located <br />remains uncertain and a issue of continuing controversy. Furthermore, the contributing effects of <br />visitor use to the erosion of archaeological resources have never been systematically evaluated, <br />although a relationship between human recreational activities and soil compaction and erosion is <br />known to exist. <br />A new cultural resource research project that was initiated in FY2003 is designed to track <br />the effects of aeolian transport of fine sediment on the preservation of archaeological resources <br />in the CRE (Rubin, 2003). This research project is one of the integrated research initiatives <br />being conducted as a component of Fine Sand-Storage (FIST) Monitoring in FY04-05. (See <br /> <br />GCMRC FY2006 Annual Work Plan (Draft February 15,2005) <br />