Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OD1736 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />Existing management actions taken through W ater Year 2004, under the Record-of- <br />Decision (ROD) failed to meet even the expectations contained in the Glen Canyon Dam EIS <br />that, compared to the no action alternative, the preferred alternative would result in sand <br />resources in the CRE increasing over time. The basic finding of the mass-balance project team is <br />that downstream transport of new sand inputs occurs much more rapidly than was previously <br />predicted by the Glen Canyon Dam EIS writing team (Rubin et aI., 2002). The rapid export of <br />new sand inputs measured during 1999 through 2004 (Figure 1.2), from sediment-starved <br />upstream reaches such as Marble Canyon, indicates that the ecosystem's sand supply does not <br />become progressively enriched over multi-year periods, except during periods when monthly <br />release volumes are at about 700,000 acre feet or lower. If most ROD dam operations prevent <br />new sand inputs from accumulating within the river channel, then re-deposition of new sand <br />inputs cannot occur during occasional controlled floods, termed "Beach/Habitat-Building <br />Flows." Such periodic releases are intended to restore and maintain sand bars that have <br />experienced erosion since dam closure. Suggested alternatives for better conserving new sand <br />inputs include timing the release of bar-building floods to more closely follow significant periods <br />of sand input from tributaries (this alternative was tested in November 2004, as discussed in a <br />subsequent section on experimental flows). Another alternative is to schedule BHBF releases <br />following periods when monthly ROD operations at Glen Canyon Dam consistently reflect <br />below-average basin-hydrology conditions (8.23 million acre feet minimum release annual <br />volumes). <br /> <br />Water Ouality Monitoring - Downstream water quality monitoring has been aimed <br />primarily at establishing a robust record of tributary and main stem temperature data under <br />different flow conditions. More recent protocols attempt to characterize a variety of other <br />parameters that provide information on the ecosystem function, such as dissolved oxygen. <br />Temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and pH are monitored continuously at Glen <br />Canyon Dam and at several locations on the Colorado River between the dam and Diamond <br />Creek. Temperature is monitored at several other mainstem locations as well as on major <br />tributaries. These data provide information on how these parameters change both in time and <br />space throughout the CRE, aid in the calibration and validation of numerical models, and serve <br />as baseline data for integration with the aquatic foodbase program. As an example, Figure 1.3 <br />shows temperature data collected at Lees Ferry and at the Grand Canyon gage (Phantom Ranch) <br />GCMRC FY2006 Annual Work Plan (Draft February 15,2005) <br />