Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />Even though I speak with diverse groups, I consistently hear the following about "business as <br />usual" 50 years from now: <br />· Statewide we will have competing uses for a limited water supply. We will have to <br />make trade-offs in order to balance our state's need for municipal and industrial (M&I), <br />agricultural, energy, and environmental/recreational uses of water. Climate change may <br />also add a new level of complexity and uncertainty to water planning. <br />· The Eastern Plains will see significant reductions in agriculture and this will adversely <br />affect the region's economy and way oflife. "Buy and dry" approaches to water <br />transfers will be the primary means of meeting water supply needs. <br />· The Front-Range will have a large urban population stretching from Fort Collins to <br />Pueblo, and these land-use decisions will guide many of Colorado's future water supply <br />options. <br />· Colorado's mountain communities will have seen the state's highest growth rates on a <br />percentage~basisas people move to these areas for the recreational. and environmental <br />amenities. Localized water supply shortages will be a challenge in these headwater <br />areas. <br /> <br />This approach comes from my discussions around the state over the past year. When I am out <br />talking with different communities, I consistently ask them to think about what Colorado will <br />look like in 50 years. What will the Eastern Plains, the Front-Range, the mountain headwaters, <br />the West Slope, North Park, and the San Luis Valley look like? How will these regions change? <br />50 years from now, what will form the economic base in each region and what will the <br />environment look like? I ask Coioradans to assume the "business as usual" scenario. <br />them ifthis is the Colorado they would like to see. Ifthis is, <br />not, then we should be doing something different. <br /> <br />Then I ask <br />then we are on the right track. If <br /> <br />We began this discussion at the October 2007 IBCC meeting (see October 2007 IBCC Meeting <br />Notes). In order to move forward, I propose that the IBCC articulate different visions for what <br />Colorado will look like in 50 years and how meeting our water supply challenges fit into those <br />VISIons. <br /> <br />At the January 2008 IBCC meeting that was cancelled, I had hoped to delve into a discussion on <br />your visions for Colorado's water supply future. In order to keep this important effort moving <br />forward, I would like for each of you to consider the questions posed in this memo and come to <br />the March IBCC meeting prepared to discuss them. <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Visions for eolorado's <br /> <br />Water Supply Future <br /> <br />Date <br /> <br />January <br /> <br />Harris D. Sherman, Executive Director ofDNR <br />Director of Compact Negotiations <br /> <br />15, <br /> <br />2007 <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />T' <br /> <br />To <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />IBCC Members <br /> <br />8'7b <br />