Laserfiche WebLink
Interim Guidelines for the <br />Operation of Lake Powell <br />and Lake Mead <br />However, given the more complicated proposed operation for Lake Powell under all of <br />the action alternatives, Reclamation conducted additional investigations and <br />subsequently refined the operational guidelines to include a combined monthly/annual <br />methodology to determine the annual release volume for Lake Powell. This <br />methodology consists of a January 1 determination of the release volume with <br />appropriate April adjustments to those volumes, and providing the necessary flexibility <br />to respond to changing inflow forecasts while ensuring that the operation does not result <br />in excessive changes in monthly releases from Lake Powell. <br />In addition, comments were also received in both written and oral form from <br />representatives of the Basin States with respect to the modeling assumptions used for <br />the Basin States Alternative and the Preferred Alternative, reflected in Appendix S of <br />the Final EIS. Specifically, the comments were in regard to the coordinated operation <br />of Lake Powell and Lake Mead when Lake Powell is relatively high and operating near <br />or in the equalization tier. A concern was identified where the proposed operation <br />might not respond effectively when Lake Powell is relatively high, Lake Mead is <br />relatively low, and a reasonably high inflow forecast occurs. Reclamation conducted <br />additional investigations to identify approaches to ensure some additional water is <br />released from Lake Powell when this situation arises. <br />Reclamation refined the proposed operational guidelines to incorporate these changes <br />(contained in Section 6, 7, and 8 of the Guidelines) and published those refinements on <br />the project website on November 1G, 2007. An evaluation concluded that these <br />refinements to the proposed Guidelines would not result in substantial changes with <br />regard to the environmental effects and fall within the impacts already analyzed in the <br />Final EIS. <br />VIII. Environmental Impacts and Implementation of <br />Environmental Commitments <br />Hydrologic modeling of the Colorado River system was conducted to determine the <br />potential hydrologic effects of the alternatives. Modeling provided projections of <br />potential future Colorado River system conditions (i.e., reservoir elevations, reservoir <br />releases, river flows) for comparison of those conditions under the No Action <br />Alternative to conditions under each action alternative. Due to the uncertainty with <br />regard to future inflows into the system, multiple simulations were performed in order <br />to quantify the uncertainties of future conditions and as such, the modeling results are <br />typically expressed in probabilistic terms. <br />Hydrologic modeling also provided the basis for the analysis of the potential effects of <br />each alternative on other environmental resources. The Final EIS evaluated 14 resource <br />areas: hydrologic resources (including reservoir storage and releases, groundwater, and <br />water deliveries), water quality, air quality, visual resources, biological resources <br />(including vegetation and wildlife and special status species), cultural resources, Indian <br />trust assets, electrical power resources, recreation (including shoreline facilities, boating <br />December 2007 ROD -Colorado River Interim Guidelines for <br />16 Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated <br />Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead <br />