My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CoSpringsUtil WCP2008
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
DayForward
>
CoSpringsUtil WCP2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2010 11:23:07 AM
Creation date
1/30/2008 2:43:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Applicant
Colorado Springs Utilities
Project Name
Colorado Springs Utilities Water Conservation Plan
Title
Colorado Springs Utilities "It's How We're All Connected" 2008-2012 Water Conservation Plan
Date
12/31/2007
County
El Paso
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
COSprings_WEPlan2015
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLORADO SPRINGS UTILITIES' 2008-2012 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN <br /> <br />PROGRAM SELECTION <br /> <br />Springs Utilities was systematic in its identification and selection of water conservation <br />programs. Two years of information gathering went into the process of selecting programs for <br />implementation. Final programs were selected based on water savings, cost-effectiveness, social <br />acceptance, lil(elihood of success, and business and system impacts. The following stal(eholders <br />were considered throughout the process. <br /> <br />. Builders and developers <br />. City Council and Utilities Board <br />. Commercial and industrial customers <br />. Community organizations <br />. Environmental and regulatory agencies <br /> <br />. Landscape and irrigation professionals <br />. Neighboring water providers <br />. Plumbers and mechanical contractors <br />. Residential customers <br />. Trade associations <br /> <br />Water Savings <br /> <br />For each program, Springs Utilities conducted a water savings analysis based on the number of <br />units to be installed, the estimated annual water savings per unit and the expected life span of the <br />unit or measure. Where possible, programs were combined to avoid counting the estimated <br />water savings more than once. Using 1999 as the baseline year, the following table ranl(s current <br />and proposed programs by water savings. <br /> <br />Table 1: Top Programs Ranked by Water Savings <br /> <br />Rank Program 2017 Water Savings <br /> (mgd) <br />1 Residential Blocl( Rates 1.33 <br />2 Commercial Seasonal Rates 1.15 <br />3 Commercial Landscape Code and Policy 1.08 <br />4 Conservation Education .81 <br />5 Water Waste Ordinance .51 <br />6 Commercial High-Efficiency Toilet Rebate .33 <br />7 Pre-Rinse Spray Nozzle Retrofit .30 <br />8 Commercial Outdoor Efficiency Incentives .25 <br />9 Commercial Indoor Efficiency Incentives .21 <br />10 Residential Clothes Washer Rebate .20 <br /> <br />Cost- Effectiveness <br /> <br />In water conservation planning, cost-effectiveness is calculated in terms of dollars per unit of <br />water saved. Typically, the most cost-effective programs are selected for implementation. In <br />addition, programs are often selected that address a gap or need in the marl(etplace, such as <br />residential new construction. Other factors considered include the educational, environmental <br />and societal benefits of the program. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.