Laserfiche WebLink
~~ <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~JVater Pro~ect Cons~ruction Loan Program - Projec~ Data <br />Borrower: Bijou Irrigation Company ~Company} County: Morgan & Ulleld <br />Prajec~ Name: B~jou Canal Diversion Structure <br />Drainage Basin: South Plat~e <br />Total Projec~ Cast: $844,000 <br />Type of Borrower: Agricu~tural <br />CVtiICB STTFPBA Fund Loan: $163,560 <br />~~ncl. 1°/0 loan fee} <br />Project Type: Rehab~li#atian <br />Wa~er Source~ So, Ptatte River <br />Funding Sources: CWCB, B1C <br />Aver. Del'rve~y: 4~,19D acre-feet <br />lnferest Rate: 2.25°/a Term; 30 years <br />The Company is a Colorada non~p~ofi~ corporat~on, p~oviding i~~iga~~on water #o a 24,~OQ-acre <br />se~vice area ~n Weld and Morgan Counties, west and south of Fort Morgan. The Campany has <br />direct flow rights at the Bijou Canal d~version on the South Platte, and maintains about 90 miles of <br />ditch, Btjou No. 2 Reservoir, and some augmentatian ponds. Ave~age headga~e dive~sions from all <br />sources are 47,46Q AF per year and annua! share de~ivery is 6,920 AF, with 2?',870 AF of <br />deplet~ons covered in ~he Company's well augmentation plan, and 1,44~ AF carried f~r ~he Putnarn <br />D~tch. ~~s sister entity, Bijou ~rriga~ion District owns and ope~ates Empire Reservoir west of For~ <br />Ma~gan. Water stored in the reservoir is delivered to users by ~he Company to supplement the <br />d~rect flows, typically in July and August. The Company river diversion structurelheadgate cansists <br />of two components: ~} the di~ch ~ntake struc~ure, wh~ch consists of a structure w~th 5 steel radial <br />gates to adjust flows into the Bijou Canal, tha~ is in good condit~on, and 2~ the river diversion <br />s~ructu~e, used to divert flow into the ditch ~ntake struc~ure, using a radial gate, slide gate and board <br />system ~o divert flow ~nto the ditch. The diversion structure has suffered extreme damage ~n times <br />af high flow in the r~v~r. This structure can not be operated in a mannerto reduce the sand <br />upstream of the intake gates. The sand bar causes excessive amount of sand to be drawn into the <br />canal and hampers diversions into the intake struc~ure. The existing divers~on also has a problem <br />with deb~is, mainly trees ge~ting hung up, and requires continuaj maintenance. The proposed <br />project would make repairs to ~he river diversion portion of the structure by constructing a 96 foot <br />long abermeye~ Pneumatic Spillway Gate ~Bladder Gate} loca~ed immediately ad~acenf to the river <br />radial gate and the canal intake ~tructure. <br />==,_;E k9 ~...,, ~ r +W-~-t r <br />..ki <br />.~ ~ <br />~ <br />~ a <br />. 1~i ~~ <br />' ~~p~'~ !~ , <br />~ <br />e.~~' ~~~ ,~' <br />.~ <br />~`.,y ° <br />`'~~~~` ° 4.". "° ~~ <br />~ <br />° ~ ~ a~ <br />' ~ ~ ~ ~'.°' r <br />_ _~-...~~c--t . . I <br />_ _ 3~, 14~ ~~~~~ <br />a <br />Loca~~on Nlap <br />