Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />During th Test, nine river gaging loc tions were monitored d <br />7-ID)..rl.o /.oIk.\~k~ ~~I <br />and strea flow measurements colle ted over a three-day 10;;6<.0,) "..t4-""L <br />period. The river, canal diversions, nd canal flows at various <br />points and w steways were also m asured. When necessary <br />flow data wer collected through i terviews with water users. <br />Attachment A p vides a detailed escription of flow <br />measurements, a alysis, and res Its. <br /> <br /> <br />Outcome <br /> <br />Test results found that mo tater quality parameters did not <br />exceed State standards. F example, results indicate that n <br />exceedences were noted f r he irrigation, livestock, and <br />wildlife habitat standards nd 0 parameters exceeded the <br />acute fishery standards. unicl al and industrial water <br />supply and secondary co tact us do not have any <br />associated standards. <br /> <br /> <br />However, several para eters were n ted to exceed the <br />chronic fishery and riv r segment stan rds. For example, <br />the high quality cold ater fishery standa d from Navajo Dam <br />to the Highway 64 br, dge at Blanco, NM, as exceeded for <br />the parameters total organic carbon and co ductivity. In <br />addition, fecal colif rm samples exceeded th standard at th <br />sites above the Hi way 44 bridge in Bloomfie and at the <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br />Summer Low Flow Report - November 2001 <br />