Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br /> <br />Service Creek <br />Green Creek <br />Harrison Creek <br /> <br />Creeks flowing into the Yampa in the study area include: <br /> <br />Walton Creek <br />Burgess Creek (via Casey's Pond) <br />Fish Creek <br />Spring Creek <br />Butcherknife Creek <br />Soda Creek <br /> <br />Geomorphology <br />The Yampa River consists of both an active river channel and a surrounding floodplain, A natural erosion <br />and deposition cycle associated with flooding is important to the health of fisheries and riparian ecosystems, <br />including cottonwood regeneration, An examination of the floodplain and the location of cottonwoods within <br />the study area indicate that the river has been altered, and much of the original floodplain has been lost to <br />development. <br /> <br />The character ofthe river differs from upstream to downstream, Upper portions of the river are only slightly <br />entrenched, have an intact and largely undeveloped floodplain, and contain meander patterns commonly found <br />in a U-shaped glacial valley, These areas include point bars on the inside of the bends and deep pools along <br />the outside, providing high quality fish habitat. The lower portion of the river, beginning in about the center of <br />the study area, has a significantly different character. The channel in these areas is highly entrenched and less <br />sinuous, with slopes about four times greater than upstream areas, Reaches of the river further downstream <br />(below the Stockbridge) retum to a more natural state, with river morphology characteristics similar to both <br />the central and upstream portions of the study area, <br /> <br />A number of habitat improvements have been made to the river. Riparian enhancements and the addition of <br />in-channel rock structures and v-dams have improved both the recreational environment and aquatic habitat. <br /> <br />Water Flow <br />The hydrologic regime (timing and amounts offlow over the year) of many rivers in the west has been <br />modified, These changes are typically caused by damming and diversion projects. The Yampa River and <br />its major tributaries have relatively few dams and diversions from the headwaters to its confluence with the <br />Green River, Reservoirs upstream of Steamboat Springs along the Yampa River include Yamcolo Reservoir, <br />Stagecoach Reservoir and Lake Catamount, none of which are major storage facilities, <br /> <br />C f...t ;.\ P ""1 E K <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />r\ I~' B () A <br /> <br />Sl'H,INCS <br /> <br />(,()LO"ADO <br /> <br />Based on a review of historic flows ofthe Yampa River at the Steamboat Springs U,S, Geological Survey <br />(USGS) gauge station, the flow regime seen in the early 1900's appears to be relatively similar to those <br />seen in the present day. Therefore, many of the physical forces of the river that influence plant and animal <br />communities in the past continue today, Figure 2-4 compares recent versus historic hydro graphs, showing <br />that the flow regimes are very similar, During both periods, peak spring flows tended to range from 2000 to <br />3000 cfs, <br /> <br />Hydrograph for the Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado <br /> <br />13000 <br /> <br />! 2500 <br />E <br />; <br />;; 2000 <br />E <br />~ 1500 <br /> <br />:l 1000 <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />c:.:J <br />o <br />u:J <br />OJ <br />..... <br /> <br />Figure 2A. Comparisons of hydro graphs for the Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado, for the period <br />between January 1911 through December of 1920 and January 1991 through December 2000. <br /> <br />I I - 8 <br /> <br />PL!\NN1NC <br /> <br />c 0 \1 T <br /> <br />X T <br />