My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12632
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:18:46 PM
Creation date
1/18/2008 2:42:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.21.F.1
Description
CO River Litigation - State-Division 4 Water Court Cases - Steamboat RICD - Yampa Management Plan
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2004
Author
City-Steamboat Sprin
Title
Yampa Management Plan-Report - 2003 - RE-Steamboat RICD - Case Number 03-CW-86 - 01-01-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />II <br /> <br />Service Creek <br />Green Creek <br />Harrison Creek <br /> <br />Creeks flowing into the Yampa in the study area include: <br /> <br />Walton Creek <br />Burgess Creek (via Casey's Pond) <br />Fish Creek <br />Spring Creek <br />Butcherknife Creek <br />Soda Creek <br /> <br />Geomorphology <br />The Yampa River consists of both an active river channel and a surrounding floodplain, A natural erosion <br />and deposition cycle associated with flooding is important to the health of fisheries and riparian ecosystems, <br />including cottonwood regeneration, An examination of the floodplain and the location of cottonwoods within <br />the study area indicate that the river has been altered, and much of the original floodplain has been lost to <br />development. <br /> <br />The character ofthe river differs from upstream to downstream, Upper portions of the river are only slightly <br />entrenched, have an intact and largely undeveloped floodplain, and contain meander patterns commonly found <br />in a U-shaped glacial valley, These areas include point bars on the inside of the bends and deep pools along <br />the outside, providing high quality fish habitat. The lower portion of the river, beginning in about the center of <br />the study area, has a significantly different character. The channel in these areas is highly entrenched and less <br />sinuous, with slopes about four times greater than upstream areas, Reaches of the river further downstream <br />(below the Stockbridge) retum to a more natural state, with river morphology characteristics similar to both <br />the central and upstream portions of the study area, <br /> <br />A number of habitat improvements have been made to the river. Riparian enhancements and the addition of <br />in-channel rock structures and v-dams have improved both the recreational environment and aquatic habitat. <br /> <br />Water Flow <br />The hydrologic regime (timing and amounts offlow over the year) of many rivers in the west has been <br />modified, These changes are typically caused by damming and diversion projects. The Yampa River and <br />its major tributaries have relatively few dams and diversions from the headwaters to its confluence with the <br />Green River, Reservoirs upstream of Steamboat Springs along the Yampa River include Yamcolo Reservoir, <br />Stagecoach Reservoir and Lake Catamount, none of which are major storage facilities, <br /> <br />C f...t ;.\ P ""1 E K <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />r\ I~' B () A <br /> <br />Sl'H,INCS <br /> <br />(,()LO"ADO <br /> <br />Based on a review of historic flows ofthe Yampa River at the Steamboat Springs U,S, Geological Survey <br />(USGS) gauge station, the flow regime seen in the early 1900's appears to be relatively similar to those <br />seen in the present day. Therefore, many of the physical forces of the river that influence plant and animal <br />communities in the past continue today, Figure 2-4 compares recent versus historic hydro graphs, showing <br />that the flow regimes are very similar, During both periods, peak spring flows tended to range from 2000 to <br />3000 cfs, <br /> <br />Hydrograph for the Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado <br /> <br />13000 <br /> <br />! 2500 <br />E <br />; <br />;; 2000 <br />E <br />~ 1500 <br /> <br />:l 1000 <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />c:.:J <br />o <br />u:J <br />OJ <br />..... <br /> <br />Figure 2A. Comparisons of hydro graphs for the Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado, for the period <br />between January 1911 through December of 1920 and January 1991 through December 2000. <br /> <br />I I - 8 <br /> <br />PL!\NN1NC <br /> <br />c 0 \1 T <br /> <br />X T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.