My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00159
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00159
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:25:56 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 1:07:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1991
Title
Interstate Transfers of Water: State Options After Sporhase
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Richard S Harsberger
Description
Interstate Transfers of Water: State Options After Sporhase
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1991] INTERSTATE TRANSFERS OF WATER <br /> <br />D. Authority of the State to Oversee Interstate <br /> <br />Transfers of Water.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. <br /> <br />1. Water as Property of the State. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . <br />2. Water Rights as Creatures of State Law ........ <br />3. The Regulation of Water Use................... <br />4. Groundwater Rights in Nebraska ............... <br />E. Constitutional Protection for Private Water Rights <br />F. Congressional Power to Regulate Groundwater Use <br /> <br />in the United States ................................................................ <br /> <br />1. Sources of Federal Power ....................... <br />2. De Facto Allocations of Water Pursuant to <br /> <br />Federal Law .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . <br /> <br />a. Statutes That Impose Planning Obligations . <br />b. Statutes That Protect Critical Areas ........ <br />c. Statutes That Allocate Water to <br /> <br />"Noneconomic" Uses ........................ <br /> <br />d. Statutes That Allocate Water to Preferred <br /> <br />Uses ......................................... <br /> <br />G. Allocation of Water Among States................. <br />1. Equitable Apportionment ....................... <br /> <br /> <br />t'-t <br />755 J' <br />781 <br />781 <br />783 <br />783 <br />784 <br />786 <br />787 <br />787 <br />790 <br />791 <br />792 <br />793 <br />793 <br />794 <br />795 <br />795 <br />796 <br />797 <br /> <br />2. Interstate CompaC'ts .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />3. Congressional Allocation ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />H. State Authority after Sporhase-Conclusion. . . . . . . . <br /> <br />IV. Interstate v. Intrastate Users: Constitutional <br />Limitations on Unequal Treatment in the Mtermath of <br /> <br />Sporhase ................................................. 799 <br /> <br />A. The Commerce Cla"USe............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 799 <br /> <br />1. BackgI"o'UIld...................................... 799 <br /> <br />2. Criteria Triggering Federal Commerce Clause <br /> <br />3. Negative Commerce Clause and Congressional <br /> <br />Scrutin.y ......................................... 801 <br /> <br />Authority' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 <br /> <br />B. State Regulation of Interstate Commerce: What is <br />Permitted, What Prohibited? ....................... 803 <br />1. Intentional Discrimination Against Interstate <br /> <br />Commerce. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803 <br /> <br />a. Facially Discriminatory Legislation ......... 803 <br />b. Facially Neutral Legislation................. 803 <br />c. Reciprocity Clauses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804 <br />2. Unintentional Discrimination Against Interstate <br /> <br />Commerce. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 <br /> <br />a. Legislation With a Discriminatory Effect. . . . 805 <br />b. The Bruce Church Test for State Regulatory <br /> <br />Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805 <br /> <br />HeinOn1ine -- 70 Neb. L. Rev. 755 1991 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.