My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00158
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:25:45 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1997
Title
A Bibliographic Pathfinder on Water Marketing
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Ronald A Kaiser
Description
A Bibliographic Pathfinder on Water Marketing
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado-Big Thompson <br /> <br />The U.S. Bureau of Recla- <br />mation's Colorado-Big <br />Thompson project has <br />been cited as a prime ex- <br />ample of efficient water marketing. <br />The project involves a series of res- <br />ervoirs to capture part of the flow <br />of the Colorado River and its <br />tributaries. An average of 230,000 <br /> <br />But limiting sales to within the con- <br />servancy district precludes even <br />more-profitable transactions that <br />might take place with buyers out- <br />side the Northern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District. For example, <br />the right to an acre-foot of water in <br />perpetuity has sold for $3,500 more <br />in the neighboring Denver suburbs <br />than in the conservancy district. 13 <br /> <br /> <br />the existing canal sys ems for dis- <br />tributing water, unce tainty as to <br />who actually owns the water <br />rights, a rural culture that believes <br />water should not be bought and <br />sold separately from la d, and slow <br />and erratic administr tive proce- <br />dures designed to prrltect third- <br />parties from injury.15 <br /> <br />Sustainable Managf' ent . <br /> <br />A consensus IS growIng <br />that sustai able eco- <br />nomic deve opment de- <br />pends on tr ating water <br />as a scarce resource an~ using eco- <br />nomic principles to gU~de its man- <br />agement and allocat on. Water <br />markets are a means f introduc- <br />ing these principles an allocating <br />supplies in response to changing <br />supply-and-demand ondi tions. <br />But marketing water di fers in im- <br />portant ways from t e sales of <br />most goods and servic s. The fu- <br />gitive nature of the re ource, the <br />variety of services it pr, vides, and <br />interdependence am ng users <br />limit the potential fo efficient <br />water marketing. Addi ional con- <br />straints result from the aws, regu- <br />lations, and treaties th t establish <br />rights to water and Ii it how it <br />can be used. <br />Water resources withi a basin- <br />precipitation, runoff, wa r in lakes <br />and streams, and ground ater-are <br />interrelated. Water users ecome in- <br />creasingly interdepende t as sup- <br />plies become scarcer. Da s, reser- <br />voirs, canals, pumps, a d levees <br />make water availability I ss depen- <br />dent on the vicissitudes f the hy- <br />drologic cycle and more ependent <br />on human decisions. This i rrastruc- <br />ture broadens the opport nities for <br />allocating supplies and enerates <br />new demands on the reso rce. <br />Reservoir operations a ect a va- <br />riety of water uses, such as flood <br /> <br />A consensus is growing that sustainable economic <br /> <br />development depends on treating water as a scarce <br /> <br />resource. <br /> <br />acre-feet of water annually is trans- <br />ferred through a tunnel from the <br />western slopes of the Rocky <br />Mountains to the Northern Colo- <br />rado Water Conservancy District <br />in northeastern Colorado. Rights <br />to proportional shares of this wa- <br />ter are freely traded, unencum- <br />bered by third-party concerns, <br />within the district. <br />Under western law, downstream <br />users generally own rights to the <br />return flows of upstream users, <br />and transfers must take account of <br />downstream impacts. But since <br />Colorado-Big Thompson water <br />originates in another basin, the <br />district has retained ownership of <br />the return flow of the diverted <br />water. This arrangement does not <br />eliminate third-party impacts, but <br />it does eliminate the need to con- <br />sider them in transfer decisions. <br />In this case, the benefits of be- <br />ing able to transfer water readily <br />among agricultural, municipal, and <br />industrial users within the district <br />are likely much greater than the costs <br />of ignoring the third-party impacts. <br /> <br />60 . FORUM for Applied Research and Public Policy <br /> <br />Chile Water. <br />Chile, which has em- <br />braced market economy <br />principles for the last <br />quarter century, has in- <br />troduced measures to encourage <br />water marketing. In 1981, the na- <br />tion separated water rights from <br />land ownership and made these <br />rights freely transferable. Views <br />differ as to the extent and benefits <br />of the water markets that emerged <br />in response to these changes. One <br />view holds that Chile's water mar- <br />kets function effectively; water <br />moves from lower to higher value <br />uses, prices are responsive to tem- <br />porary as well as longer-term scar- <br />city, and trading is active. 14 <br />A less-optimistic view holds <br />that transfers of water rights sepa- <br />rate from land ownership are un- <br />common, involve only a small per- <br />centage of users, and result in little <br />actual reallocation of supplies. In <br />particular, several factors are cited <br />as inhibiting sales of water rights <br />separate from land ownership. <br />These include the inflexibility of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.