Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />896 <br /> <br />NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL <br /> <br />[Vol 37 <br /> <br />2. Other Environmental Protection Strategies <br /> <br />An alternative literature tract explores the regulatory approach and the nuances ofthe pu lie <br />trust doctrine as a means for reallocating water to protect water-based environmental Jnd <br />recreational resources. l <br /> <br />Richard Ausness, Water Rights, the Public Trust Doctrine, and the Protection of Instream Uses, . <br />ILL. L. REV. 407 (1986). <br /> <br />Lynda Butler, Environmental Water Rights: An Evolving Concept of Public Property, 9 VA ENW <br />L.J. 323 (1990). <br /> <br />David Hallford, Environmental Regulations as Water Rights Taking, 6 NAT. RESOURCES & <br />ENVT.13(1991). <br /> <br />John Harbison, Waist Deep in the Big Muddy: Property Rights, Public Values, and Instream Wate , <br />26 LAND & WATER L. REv. 535 (1991). <br /> <br />Ronald Kaiser & Sharon Kelly, Water Rightsfor Texas Estuaries, 18 TEX. TECH L. REv. 1121 <br />(1987). <br /> <br />RONALD KAISER & SHARON KELLY, PROTECTING FRESHWATER INFLOWS INT <br />TEXAS ESTUARIES: AN EVALUATION OF LEGAL STRATEGIES 131-39 (198 ) <br />(Proceedings of the Society of the Agricultural Engineers' National Symposium on Water Resource <br />Law, Chicago, lllinois). <br /> <br />Joseph Kaufman, An Analysis of Developing Instream Water Rights in Oregon,28 WILLAMETT <br />L. REv. 285 (1992). <br /> <br /> <br />V. INTERBASIN TRANSFERS <br /> <br />One approach to providing water in areas of limited supply is to physically transfer wate <br />from one watershed to another. This is cryptically termed the engineering approach because of the <br />extensive infrastructure needed to move the water. Interbasin transfers have been a common means <br />of augmenting supply through the United States. For example, New York City gets part of its <br />municipal water from the Delaware Basin, Denver from the Colorado River Basin and Los Angeles <br />from the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. Since these large-scale interstate transfers evoke <br />substantial political and legal controversy they have limited viability for meeting the new water <br />needs. Smaller intrastate transfers have been more commonplace and may have some potential. <br />Because of the possible severe effects on the economy, ecology, culture, lifestyle and <br />potential future growth in the originating basin most <br />states have established "area-of -origin" protection requirements. These statutory safeguards increase <br />transfer costs and may impose substantial barriers to transfers. <br /> <br />1. Intrastate Transfers <br /> <br />Robert Abrams, Interbasin Transfer in a Riparian Jurisdiction, 24 WM. & MARY L. REV. 591 <br />(1983). <br />